Facial Aesthetic Outcomes of Cleft Surgery: Assessment of Discrete Lip and Nose Images Compared with Digital Symmetry Analysis

被引:17
作者
Deall, Ciara E.
Kornmann, Nirvana S. S.
Bella, Husam
Wallis, Katy L.
Hardwicke, Joseph T.
Su, Ting-Li
Richard, Bruce M.
机构
[1] Birmingham Childrens Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Birmingham Inst Paediat Plast Surg, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Clin & Expt Med, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Dent, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
NASOLABIAL APPEARANCE; INFANT ORTHOPEDICS; SCORING SYSTEMS; PALATE PATIENTS; PROFESSIONALS; PHOTOGRAPHS; DUTCHCLEFT; ASYMMETRY; LAYPEOPLE; NASAL;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000002601
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: High-quality aesthetic outcomes are of paramount importance to children growing up after cleft lip and palate surgery. Establishing a validated and reliable assessment tool for cleft professionals and families will facilitate cleft units, surgeons, techniques, and protocols to be audited and compared with greater confidence. This study used exemplar images across a five-point aesthetic scale, identified in a pilot project, to score lips and noses as separate units and compared these human scores with computer-based SymNose symmetry scores. Methods: Forty-five assessors (17 cleft surgeons nationally and 28 other cleft professionals from the UK South West Tri-centre units), scored 25 standardized photographs, uploaded randomly onto a Web-based platform, twice. Each photograph was shown in three forms: lip and nose together, and separately cropped images of nose only and lip only. The same images were analyzed using the SymNose software program. Results: Scoring lips gave the best intrarater and interrater reliabilities. Nose scores were more variable. Lip scoring associated most closely with the whole-image score. SymNose ranking of the lip images related highly to the same ranking by humans (p = 0.001). The exemplar images maintained their established previous ranking. Conclusions: Images illustrating the aesthetic outcome grades are confirmed. The lip score is reliable and seems to dominate in the whole-image score. Noses are much harder to score reliably. It appears that SymNose can score lip images very effectively by symmetry. Further use of SymNose will be investigated, and families of children with cleft will trial the scoring system.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 862
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] ASHERMCDADE C, 1991, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V28, P385, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1991)028<0385:DOAMFR>2.3.CO
  • [2] 2
  • [3] Effect of infant orthopedics on facial appearance of toddlers with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft)
    Bongaarts, Catharina A. M.
    Prahl-Andersen, Birte
    Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
    Spauwen, Paul H. M.
    Mulder, Jan W.
    Vaandrager, J. Michiel
    Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne M.
    [J]. CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2008, 45 (04) : 407 - 413
  • [4] FARKAS LG, 1993, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V30, P1, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1993)030<0001:AAAFOT>2.3.CO
  • [5] 2
  • [6] Feragen KJB, 1999, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V36, P527
  • [7] Nasal asymmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate
    Freeman, A. K.
    Mercer, N. S. G.
    Roberts, L. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2013, 66 (04) : 506 - 512
  • [8] Aesthetic outcome of cleft lip and palate treatment. Perceptions of patients, families, and health professionals compared to the general public
    Gkantidis, Nikolaos
    Papamanou, Despina A.
    Christou, Panagiotis
    Topouzelis, Nikolaos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (07) : E105 - E110
  • [9] A review of outcome measures used in cleft care
    Jones, Timothy
    Al-Ghatam, Rana
    Atack, Nikki
    Deacon, Scott
    Power, Rosie
    Albery, Liz
    Ireland, Tony
    Sandy, Jonathan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2014, 41 (02) : 128 - 140
  • [10] A simple assessment method for auditing multi-centre unilateral cleft lip repairs
    Kim, J. B.
    Strike, P.
    Cadier, M. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2011, 64 (02) : 195 - 200