Quality of birth care in maternity hospitals of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

被引:39
作者
d'Orsi, E
Chor, D
Giffin, K
Angulo-Tuesta, A
Barbosa, GP
Gama, AD
Reis, AC
Hartz, Z
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Fac Med, Tubarao, SC, Brazil
[2] Escola Nacl Saude Publica, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Minist Saude, Secretaria Ciencia Tecnol & Insumos Estrateg, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[4] Sectetaria Estado Saude Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Fac Serv Social, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[6] Fiocruz MS, BR-21045900 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
来源
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA | 2005年 / 39卷 / 04期
关键词
maternal and child health; quality of health care; delivery; delivery obstetric; natural childbirth; health services research;
D O I
10.1590/S0034-89102005000400020
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the quality of birth care based on the World Health Organization guidelines. Methods A case-control study was carried out in a public and a private maternity hospitals contracted by the Brazilian Health System in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from October 1998 to March 1999. The sample comprised 461 women in the public maternity hospital (230 vaginal deliveries and 231 Cesarean sections) and 448 women in the private one (224 vaginal deliveries and 224 Cesarean sections). Data was collected through interviews with puerperal women and review of medical records. A summarization score of quality of delivery care was constructed. Results There was low frequency of practices that should be encouraged, such as having an accompanying person (1% in the private hospital for both vaginal delivery and C-sections), freedom of movements throughout labor (9.6% of C-sections in the public hospital and 9.9% of vaginal deliveries in the private hospital) and breastfeeding in the delivery room (6.9% of C-sections in the public hospital and 8.0% of C-sections in the private hospital). There was a high frequency of known harmful practices such as enema administration (38.4%); routine pubic shaving; routine intravenous infusion (88.8%); routine use of oxytocin (64.4%), strict bed rest throughout labor (90.1%) and routine supine position in labor (98.7%) in vaginal deliveries. The best summarizing scores were seen in the public maternity hospital. Conclusions The two maternity hospitals have a high frequency of interventions during birth care. In spite of providing care to higher risk pregnant women, the public maternity hospital has a less interventionist profile than the private one. Procedures carried out on a routine basis should be pondered based on evidence of their benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 654
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
ALTHABE F, 2002, BRIT MED J, V321, P945
[2]  
Angulo-Tuesta Antonia, 2003, Cad. Saúde Pública, V19, P1425, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2003000500021
[3]  
CARROLI G, 2002, COCHRANE LIB
[4]  
CARVALHO ML, 1993, MORTALIDADE NEONATAL
[5]  
CONTANDRIOPOULO.AP, 2003, AVALIACAO SAUDE MODE, P29
[6]  
Cosendey Marly Aparecida E., 2003, Cad. Saúde Pública, V19, P395, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2003000200006
[7]  
DIAS MAB, 2001, CESARIANA EPIDEMIA D
[8]  
DORSI E, 2003, THESIS ENSP FIOCRUZ
[9]  
GOMES MASM, 1995, ASPECTOS QUALIDADE A
[10]  
Lopes M H, 2001, Rev Lat Am Enfermagem, V9, P49