Population screening for coeliac disease in primary care by district nurses using a rapid antibody test:: diagnostic accuracy and feasibility study

被引:112
作者
Korponay-Szabo, Ilma R.
Szabados, Katalin
Pusztai, Janosne
Uhrin, Katalin
Ludmany, Eva
Nemes, Eva
Kaukinen, Katri
Kapitany, Aniko
Koskinen, Lotta
Sipka, Sandor
Imre, Aniko
Maki, Markku [1 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Paediat Res Ctr, Tampere 33014, Finland
[2] Univ Debrecen, Dept Paediat, Med & Hlth Sci Ctr, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
[3] Heim Pal Childrens Hosp, Coeliac Dis Ctr, H-1089 Budapest, Hungary
[4] Hetenyi Geza Cty Hosp, Dept Infectol, H-5000 Szolnok, Hungary
[5] Cty Inst Publ Hlth & Hlth Officer Serv, H-5000 Szolnok, Hungary
[6] Hetenyi Geza Cty Hosp, Dept Pathol, H-5000 Szolnok, Hungary
[7] Tampere Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Gastroenterol & Alimentary Tract Surg, Tampere 33014, Finland
[8] Univ Debrecen, Reg Immunol Lab, Dept Internal Med 3, Med & Hlth Sci Ctr, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
[9] Univ Helsinki, Dept Med Genet, Biomed Helsinki, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2007年 / 335卷 / 7632期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.39405.472975.80
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of screening for coeliac disease by rapid detection of IgA antibodies to tissue transglutaminase performed in primary care. Design District nurses screened 6 year old children using rapid antibody testing of finger prick blood. They also collected capillary blood samples for laboratory determination of IgA and IgG antibodies to endomysium and IgA antibodies to tissue transglutaminase. Children with positive rapid test results were directly sent for biopsy of the small intestine. Setting Primary care in Jasz-Nagykun-Szolnok county, Hungary. Participants 2690 children (77% of 6 year olds living in the county) and 120 nurses. Main outcome measures Positivity for antibodies to endomysium or transglutaminase in the laboratory and coeliac disease confirmed at biopsy. Results 37 children (1.4%, 95% confidence interval 0.9% to 1.8%) had biopsy confirmed coeliac disease. Only five of these children had been diagnosed clinically before screening. Rapid testing had a 78.1% sensitivity (70.0% to 89.3%) and 100% specificity (88.4% to 100%) for a final diagnosis of coeliac disease by biopsy. Sensitivity was 65.1% (50.2% to 77.6%) and specificity was 100% (99.8% to 100%) compared with combined results of IgA and IgG laboratory tests. Trained laboratory workers detected 30 of the 31 newly diagnosed IgA competent patients with the rapid test kit used blindly. Median time to biopsy after a positive rapid test result was significantly shorter (20 days, range 4-148) than after a positive laboratory result (142 days, 70-256; P<0.001). Children with coeliac disease detected at screening were smaller and had worse health status than their peers but they improved on a gluten-free diet. ConclusionsA simple rapid antibody test enabled primary care nurses to detect patients with coeliac disease in the community who were not picked up in clinical care. Extra training is needed to improve sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1244 / 1247
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Coeliac disease in primary care: Evaluation of a case-finding strategy
    Berti, I.
    Della Vedova, R.
    Paduano, R.
    Devetta, M.
    Caradonna, M.
    Villanacci, V.
    Not, T.
    Martelossi, S.
    Tamburlini, G.
    Ventura, A.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2006, 38 (07) : 461 - 467
  • [2] Undiagnosed coeliac disease at age seven: population based prospective birth cohort study
    Bingley, PJ
    Williams, AJK
    Norcross, AJ
    Unsworth, DJ
    Lock, RJ
    Ness, AR
    Jones, RW
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7435): : 322 - 323
  • [3] SEROLOGICAL SCREENING OF CELIAC-DISEASE - CHOOSING THE OPTIMAL PROCEDURE ACCORDING TO VARIOUS PREVALENCE VALUES
    CORRAO, G
    CORAZZA, GR
    ANDREANI, ML
    TORCHIO, P
    VALENTINI, RA
    GALATOLA, G
    QUAGLINO, D
    GASBARRINI, G
    DIORIO, F
    [J]. GUT, 1994, 35 (06) : 771 - 775
  • [4] DARVAY S, 1997, REFERENCE VALUES INV
  • [5] Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States - A large multicenter study
    Fasano, A
    Berti, I
    Gerarduzzi, T
    Not, T
    Colletti, RB
    Drago, S
    Elitsur, Y
    Green, PHR
    Guandalini, S
    Hill, ID
    Pietzak, M
    Ventura, A
    Thorpe, M
    Kryszak, D
    Fornaroli, F
    Wasserman, SS
    Murray, JA
    Horvath, K
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (03) : 286 - 292
  • [6] Protagonist - European and North American populations should be screened for coeliac disease
    Fasano, A
    [J]. GUT, 2003, 52 (02) : 168 - 169
  • [7] Coeliac disease
    Green, PHR
    Jabri, B
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 362 (9381) : 383 - 391
  • [8] Coeliac disease in primary care: case finding study
    Hin, H
    Bird, G
    Fisher, P
    Mahy, N
    Jewell, D
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7177): : 164 - 167
  • [9] Pre-endoscopy serological testing for coeliac disease: evaluation of a clinical decision tool
    Hopper, Andrew D.
    Cross, Simon S.
    Hurlstone, David P.
    McAlindon, Mark E.
    Lobo, Alan J.
    Hadjivassiliou, Marios
    Sloan, Marion E.
    Dixon, Simon
    Sanders, David S.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7596): : 729 - +
  • [10] Intraepithelial lymphocytes in celiac disease
    Järvinen, TT
    Kaukinen, K
    Laurila, K
    Kyrönpalo, S
    Rasmussen, M
    Mäki, M
    Korhonen, H
    Reunala, T
    Collin, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (06) : 1332 - 1337