Identifying influential nodes in social networks: A voting approach

被引:45
作者
Liu, Panfeng [1 ]
Li, Longjie [1 ]
Fang, Shiyu [1 ]
Yao, Yukai [2 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ Technol, Sch Comp & Commun, Lanzhou 730050, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Social networks; Influence maximization; Voting approach; Spreading model; INFLUENCE MAXIMIZATION; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; COMPLEX NETWORKS; SPREADERS; IDENTIFICATION; RANKING; CENTRALITY; DYNAMICS; INDEX; USERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111309
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
With the prosperity of social networks, the research of influence maximization has become growing importance and captured increasing attention from various disciplines. The key point in influence maximization is to identify a group of influential nodes that are scattered broadly in a network. In this regard, we propose the VoteRank(++) method, which is a voting approach, to iteratively select the influential nodes. In the viewpoint of VoteRank(++), nodes with different degrees should carry different amounts of votes in consideration of the diversity of nodes in voting ability, and a node may vote differently for its neighbors by considering the varying degrees of closeness between nodes. Moreover, to reduce the overlapping of influential regions of spreaders, VoteRank(++) discounts the voting ability of 2-hop neighbors of the selected nodes. Then, to avoid the cost of calculating the voting scores of all nodes in each iteration, only the nodes whose scores may change need to update their voting scores. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we employ both the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered and Linear Threshold models to simulate the spreading progress. Experimental results show that VoteRank(++) outperforms the baselines on both spreading speed and infected scale in most of the cases. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], mizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network
[2]   Influence maximization of informed agents in social networks [J].
AskariSichani, Omid ;
Jalili, Mahdi .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2015, 254 :229-239
[3]   Identifying and ranking influential spreaders in complex networks by neighborhood coreness [J].
Bae, Joonhyun ;
Kim, Sangwook .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2014, 395 :549-559
[4]   Identifying Top-k Nodes in Social Networks: A Survey [J].
Bian, Ranran ;
Koh, Yun Sing ;
Dobbie, Gillian ;
Divoli, Anna .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2019, 52 (01)
[5]   Models of social networks based on social distance attachment -: art. no. 056122 [J].
Boguñá, M ;
Pastor-Satorras, R ;
Díaz-Guilera, A ;
Arenas, A .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2004, 70 (05) :8-1
[6]   Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations [J].
Bonacich, P ;
Lloyd, P .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2001, 23 (03) :191-201
[7]   A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization [J].
Bond, Robert M. ;
Fariss, Christopher J. ;
Jones, Jason J. ;
Kramer, Adamd. I. ;
Marlow, Cameron ;
Settle, Jaime E. ;
Fowler, James H. .
NATURE, 2012, 489 (7415) :295-298
[8]   Topological structure analysis of the protein-protein interaction network in budding yeast [J].
Bu, DB ;
Zhao, Y ;
Cai, L ;
Xue, H ;
Zhu, XP ;
Lu, HC ;
Zhang, JF ;
Sun, SW ;
Ling, LJ ;
Zhang, N ;
Li, GJ ;
Chen, RS .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2003, 31 (09) :2443-2450
[9]   Disease spreading in populations of moving agents [J].
Buscarino, A. ;
Fortuna, L. ;
Frasca, M. ;
Latora, V. .
EPL, 2008, 82 (03)
[10]   Thresholds for Epidemic Spreading in Networks [J].
Castellano, Claudio ;
Pastor-Satorras, Romualdo .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2010, 105 (21)