Impact of physical decontamination methods on zirconia implant surface and subsequent bacterial adhesion: An in-vitro study

被引:5
|
作者
Tan, Nathan Chiang Ping [1 ]
Miller, Catherine M. [2 ,3 ]
Antunes, Elsa [4 ]
Sharma, Dileep [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Coll Med & Dent, 14-88 McGregor Rd, Smithfield, Qld 4878, Australia
[2] James Cook Univ, Coll Publ Hlth Med & Vet Sci, Smithfield, Qld, Australia
[3] James Cook Univ, Australian Inst Trop Hlth & Med, Smithfield, Qld, Australia
[4] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Townsville, Qld, Australia
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH | 2022年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
decontamination; dental implant; peri-implantitis; zirconia; TITANIUM DENTAL IMPLANTS; MECHANICAL INSTRUMENTS; ULTRASONIC SCALERS; ORAL IMPLANT; PART; ROUGHNESS; DISEASES; MANAGEMENT; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/cre2.486
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effect of routinely used physical decontamination methods on the surface characteristics of zirconia implants and subsequent ability of bacteria to adhere in vitro. Background: Physical decontamination methods commonly used in peri-implantitis therapy and routine implant maintenance can potentially alter zirconia implant surfaces. Methods: Acid-etched zirconia discs were instrumented with titanium curette (TC), plastic curette, air abrasive device, ultrasonic scaler (US) with stainless steel tip. Following instrumentation, surface topography, and surface elemental composition was analyzed using 3D-laser scanning microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, respectively. Subsequently, plaque biofilm was cultured on zirconia discs for 48 h and bacterial adhesion assessed using a turbidity test and scanning electron microscopy. Results: A significant difference in surface roughness was observed between the US and control group (p < 0.05). The US and TC caused gray surface discolouration on zirconia discs due to deposition of metallic residue as confirmed by X-ray spectroscopy. No significant difference in bacterial adhesion was noted among all treatment groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: TC and US with stainless steel tips should be used with caution due to deposition of metallic residue on the surface. Air abrasive devices and plastic curettes caused minimal surface alterations and are, therefore, safer for zirconia implant decontamination.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 321
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biocompatibility, Surface Morphology, and Bacterial Load of Dental Implant Abutments following Decontamination Protocols: An In-Vitro Study
    Sharon, Esi
    Pietrokovski, Yoav
    Engel, Ilana
    Assali, Rula
    Houri-Haddad, Yael
    Beyth, Nurit
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (11)
  • [2] The effects of physical decontamination methods on zirconia implant surfaces: a systematic review
    Tan, Nathan Chiang Ping
    Khan, Ahsen
    Antunes, Elsa
    Miller, Catherine M.
    Sharma, Dileep
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2021, 51 (05): : 298 - 315
  • [3] Implant Surface Decontamination Methods That Can Impact Implant Wettability
    Romanos, Georgios E.
    Mistretta, Lauren
    Newman, Allyson
    Ohana, Danielle
    Delgado-Ruiz, Rafael A.
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (24)
  • [4] CONTAMINATED IMPLANT SURFACES - AN IN-VITRO COMPARISON OF IMPLANT SURFACE COATING AND TREATMENT MODALITIES FOR DECONTAMINATION
    DENNISON, DK
    HUERZELER, MB
    QUINONES, C
    CAFFESSE, RG
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1994, 65 (10) : 942 - 948
  • [5] The efficacy of different implant surface decontamination methods using spectrophotometric analysis: an in vitro study
    Giffi, Roberto
    Pietropaoli, Davide
    Mancini, Leonardo
    Tarallo, Francesco
    Sahrmann, Philipp
    Marchetti, Enrico
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 53 (04): : 295 - 305
  • [6] Surface properties of titanium and zirconia dental implant materials and their effect on bacterial adhesion
    Al-Radha, Afya Sahib Diab
    Dymock, David
    Younes, Charles
    O'Sullivan, Dominic
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2012, 40 (02) : 146 - 153
  • [7] Comparative evaluation of surface roughness and bacterial adhesion on two bioactive cements: an in-vitro study
    Dey, Pallabi
    Suprabha, Baranya Shrikrishna
    Suman, Ethel
    Natarajan, Srikant
    Shenoy, Ramya
    Rao, Arathi
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [8] In Vitro Evaluation of Implant Surface Decontamination Methods Based on Removal and Regrowth of Microorganisms
    Lee, Jung-Tae
    Jang, Il-Seok
    Moon, Jong-Hoon
    Yang, Seung-Min
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (06) : 1088 - 1094
  • [9] Initial Bacterial Adhesion on Different Yttria-Stabilized Tetragonal Zirconia Implant Surfaces in Vitro
    Karygianni, Lamprini
    Jaehnig, Andrea
    Schienle, Stefanie
    Bernsmann, Falk
    Adolfsson, Erik
    Kohal, Ralf J.
    Chevalier, Jerome
    Hellwig, Elmar
    Al-Ahmad, Ali
    MATERIALS, 2013, 6 (12): : 5659 - 5674
  • [10] Comparison between four different implant surface debridement methods: an in-vitro experimental study
    Mensi, Magda
    Viviani, Lorenzo
    Agosti, Raffaele
    Scotti, Eleonora
    Garzetti, Gianluca
    Calza, Stefano
    MINERVA STOMATOLOGICA, 2020, 69 (05): : 286 - 294