Obol: integrating language and meaning in bio-ontologies

被引:58
|
作者
Mungall, CJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mol & Cell Biol, HHMI, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
COMPARATIVE AND FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS | 2004年 / 5卷 / 6-7期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/cfg.435
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Ontologies are intended to capture and formalize a domain of knowledge. The ontologies comprising the Open Biological Ontologies (OBO) project, which includes the Gene Ontology (GO), are formalizations of various domains of biological knowledge. Ontologies within OBO typically lack computable definitions that serve to differentiate a term from other similar terms. The computer is unable to determine the meaning of a term, which presents problems for tools such as automated reasoners. Reasoners can be of enormous benefit in managing a complex ontology. OBO term names frequently implicitly encode the kind of definitions that can be used by computational tools, such as automated reasoners. The definitions encoded in the names are not easily amenable to computation, because the names are ostensibly natural language phrases designed for human users. These names are highly regular in their grammar, and can thus be treated as valid sentences in some formal or computable language. With a description of the rules underlying this formal language, term names can be parsed to derive computable definitions, which can then be reasoned over. This paper describes the effort to elucidate that language, called Obol, and the attempts to reason over the resulting definitions. The current implementation finds unique non-trivial definitions for around half of the terms in the GO, and has been used to find 223 missing relationships, which have since been added to the ontology. Obol has utility as an ontology maintenance tool, and as a means of generating computable definitions for a whole ontology. The software is available under an open-source license from: http://www.fruitfly. org/-cjm/obol. Supplementary material for this article can be found at: http://www. interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1531-6912/suppmat. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 520
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bio-ontologies for neuroscience
    Bult, Carol
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 31 : S56 - S56
  • [2] Are bio-ontologies metaphysical theories?
    Lean, Oliver M.
    SYNTHESE, 2021, 199 (3-4) : 11587 - 11608
  • [3] Mereological semantics for bio-ontologies
    Hahn, U
    Schulz, S
    Markó, K
    PROCEEDING OF THE NINETEENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE SIXTEENTH CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2004, : 257 - 262
  • [4] Wrestling with SUMO and bio-ontologies
    Mark A. Musen
    Suzanna Lewis
    Barry Smith
    Nature Biotechnology, 2006, 24 : 21 - 21
  • [5] Wrestling with SUMO and bio-ontologies
    Christian Stoeckert
    Catherine Ball
    Alvis Brazma
    Ryan Brinkman
    Helen Causton
    Liju Fan
    Jennifer Fostel
    Gilberto Fragoso
    Mervi Heiskanen
    Frank Holstege
    Norman Morrison
    Helen Parkinson
    John Quackenbush
    Philippe Rocca-Serra
    Susanna-Assunta Sansone
    Ugis Sarkans
    Gavin Sherlock
    Robert Stevens
    Chris Taylor
    Ronald Taylor
    Patricia Whetzel
    Joseph White
    Nature Biotechnology, 2006, 24 (1) : 21 - 22
  • [6] Bio-ontologies - fast and furious
    Blake, J
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 22 (06) : 773 - 774
  • [7] Are bio-ontologies metaphysical theories?
    Oliver M. Lean
    Synthese, 2021, 199 : 11587 - 11608
  • [8] Process attributes in bio-ontologies
    Andrade, Andre Q.
    Blonde, Ward
    Hastings, Janna
    Schulz, Stefan
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 13
  • [9] Bio-ontologies—fast and furious
    Judith Blake
    Nature Biotechnology, 2004, 22 : 773 - 774
  • [10] Wrestling with SUMO and bio-ontologies
    Musen, MA
    Lewis, S
    Smith, B
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 24 (01) : 21 - 21