A Model-Based Reliability Metric Considering Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty

被引:42
作者
Zeng, Zhiguo [1 ]
Kang, Rui [2 ]
Wen, Meilin [2 ]
Zio, Enrico [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, Cent Supelec, Fdn Elect France, Chair Syst Sci & Energy Challenge, F-92290 Chatenay Malabry, France
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Reliabil & Syst Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Politecn Milan, Dept Energy, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Reliability; physics-of-failure; epistemic uncertainty; model uncertainty; belief reliability; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2733839
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Model-based reliability analysis and assessment methods rely on models, which are assumed to be precise, to predict reliability. In practice, however, the precision of the model cannot be guaranteed due to the presence of epistemic uncertainty. In this paper, a new reliability metric, called belief reliability, is defined to explicitly account for epistemic uncertainty in model-based reliability analysis and assessment. A new method is developed to explicitly quantify epistemic uncertainty by measuring the effectiveness of the engineering analysis and assessment activities related to reliability. To evaluate belief reliability, an integrated framework is presented where the contributions of design margin, aleatory uncertainty, and epistemic uncertainty are integrated to yield a comprehensive and systematic description of reliability. The developed methods are demonstrated by two case studies.
引用
收藏
页码:15505 / 15515
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Model-based testing considering cost, reliability and software quality [J].
Htoon, Chaw Yupar ;
Thein, Ni Lar .
APSITT 2005: 6th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information and Telecommunication Technologies, Proceedings, 2005, :160-164
[32]   Investor Behavior Under Epistemic vs. Aleatory Uncertainty [J].
Walters, Daniel J. ;
Ulkumen, Gulden ;
Tannenbaum, David ;
Erner, Carsten ;
Fox, Craig R. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2023, 69 (05) :2761-2777
[33]   Extended Component Importance Measures Considering Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainties [J].
Sallak, Mohamed ;
Schoen, Walter ;
Aguirre, Felipe .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2013, 62 (01) :49-65
[34]   INFLUENCE OF MODEL ERROR AS EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTY IN RELIABILITY-BASED INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT [J].
Koduru, Smitha ;
Ibrahim, Mahmoud ;
Shahzad, Khurram ;
Hassanien, Sherif .
PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 14TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, IPC2022, VOL 1, 2022,
[35]   Mixed aleatory/epistemic uncertainty analysis and optimization for minimum EEDI hull form design [J].
Hou, Yuan Hang ;
Li, Yun Jia ;
Liang, Xiao .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2019, 172 :308-315
[36]   Epistemic Uncertainty in Reliability-Based Design Optimization [J].
Zhuang, Xiaotian ;
Pan, Rong .
2012 PROCEEDINGS - ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS), 2012,
[37]   Positioning Accuracy Reliability Analysis of Industrial Robots Considering Epistemic Uncertainty and Correlation [J].
Cao, Lixiong ;
Liu, Jie ;
Zhang, Jinhe ;
Jiang, Chao ;
Zhang, Dequan .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2023, 145 (02)
[38]   Mixed aleatory and epistemic uncertainty quantification using fuzzy set theory [J].
He, Yanyan ;
Mirzargar, Mahsa ;
Kirby, Robert M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2015, 66 :1-15
[39]   Wear Prediction of a Mechanism With Joint Clearance Involving Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty [J].
Sun, Dongyang ;
Chen, Guoping ;
Wang, Tiecheng ;
Sun, Rujie .
JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (04)
[40]   Relative contributions of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty sources in time series prediction [J].
Li, Chenzhao ;
Mahadevan, Sankaran .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2016, 82 :474-486