A Model-Based Reliability Metric Considering Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty

被引:43
作者
Zeng, Zhiguo [1 ]
Kang, Rui [2 ]
Wen, Meilin [2 ]
Zio, Enrico [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, Cent Supelec, Fdn Elect France, Chair Syst Sci & Energy Challenge, F-92290 Chatenay Malabry, France
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Reliabil & Syst Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Politecn Milan, Dept Energy, I-20133 Milan, Italy
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2017年 / 5卷
关键词
Reliability; physics-of-failure; epistemic uncertainty; model uncertainty; belief reliability; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2733839
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Model-based reliability analysis and assessment methods rely on models, which are assumed to be precise, to predict reliability. In practice, however, the precision of the model cannot be guaranteed due to the presence of epistemic uncertainty. In this paper, a new reliability metric, called belief reliability, is defined to explicitly account for epistemic uncertainty in model-based reliability analysis and assessment. A new method is developed to explicitly quantify epistemic uncertainty by measuring the effectiveness of the engineering analysis and assessment activities related to reliability. To evaluate belief reliability, an integrated framework is presented where the contributions of design margin, aleatory uncertainty, and epistemic uncertainty are integrated to yield a comprehensive and systematic description of reliability. The developed methods are demonstrated by two case studies.
引用
收藏
页码:15505 / 15515
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Stochastic Uncertain Degradation Modeling and Remaining Useful Life Prediction Considering Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty [J].
Cao, Xuerui ;
Peng, Kaixiang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2023, 72
[22]   An approximate epistemic uncertainty analysis approach in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties [J].
Hofer, E ;
Kloos, M ;
Krzykacz-Hausmann, B ;
Peschke, J ;
Woltereck, M .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2002, 77 (03) :229-238
[23]   Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J].
Xiahou T. ;
Chen J. ;
Shao Z. ;
Wu X. ;
Liu Y. .
Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43 (08)
[24]   Mixed Aleatory-epistemic Uncertainty Modeling of Wind Power Forecast Errors in Operation Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems [J].
Ding, Jinfeng ;
Xie, Kaigui ;
Hu, Bo ;
Shao, Changzheng ;
Niu, Tao ;
Li, Chunyan ;
Pan, Congcong .
JOURNAL OF MODERN POWER SYSTEMS AND CLEAN ENERGY, 2022, 10 (05) :1174-1183
[25]   Reliability Analysis for Complex Systems Based on Dynamic Evidential Network Considering Epistemic Uncertainty [J].
Duan, Rongxing ;
Lin, Yanni ;
Hu, Longfei .
CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2017, 113 (01) :17-34
[26]   Confidence region method for quantification of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J].
Sun, Dongyang ;
Chen, Guoping ;
Zhang, Baoqiang .
Zhendong Ceshi Yu Zhenduan/Journal of Vibration, Measurement and Diagnosis, 2015, 35 (05) :908-912
[27]   Aleatory and epistemic uncertainties analysis based on non-probabilistic reliability and its kriging solution [J].
Li, Guijie ;
Lu, Zhenzhou ;
Li, Luyi ;
Ren, Bo .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2016, 40 (9-10) :5703-5716
[28]   Risk-based reliability assessment under epistemic uncertainty [J].
Khalaj, M. ;
Makui, A. ;
Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2012, 25 (03) :571-581
[29]   Mixed aleatory and epistemic uncertainty propagation using Dempster-Shafer theory [J].
He, Yanyan ;
Hussaini, M. Yousuff .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2023, 429
[30]   Model-based testing considering cost, reliability and software quality [J].
Htoon, Chaw Yupar ;
Thein, Ni Lar .
APSITT 2005: 6th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information and Telecommunication Technologies, Proceedings, 2005, :160-164