A Model-Based Reliability Metric Considering Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty

被引:43
作者
Zeng, Zhiguo [1 ]
Kang, Rui [2 ]
Wen, Meilin [2 ]
Zio, Enrico [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, Cent Supelec, Fdn Elect France, Chair Syst Sci & Energy Challenge, F-92290 Chatenay Malabry, France
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Reliabil & Syst Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Politecn Milan, Dept Energy, I-20133 Milan, Italy
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2017年 / 5卷
关键词
Reliability; physics-of-failure; epistemic uncertainty; model uncertainty; belief reliability; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2733839
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Model-based reliability analysis and assessment methods rely on models, which are assumed to be precise, to predict reliability. In practice, however, the precision of the model cannot be guaranteed due to the presence of epistemic uncertainty. In this paper, a new reliability metric, called belief reliability, is defined to explicitly account for epistemic uncertainty in model-based reliability analysis and assessment. A new method is developed to explicitly quantify epistemic uncertainty by measuring the effectiveness of the engineering analysis and assessment activities related to reliability. To evaluate belief reliability, an integrated framework is presented where the contributions of design margin, aleatory uncertainty, and epistemic uncertainty are integrated to yield a comprehensive and systematic description of reliability. The developed methods are demonstrated by two case studies.
引用
收藏
页码:15505 / 15515
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Model-Based Reliability Analysis With Both Model Uncertainty and Parameter Uncertainty [J].
Xi, Zhimin .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2019, 141 (05)
[12]   Quantification of Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty in Bulk Power System Reliability Evaluation [J].
Awadallah, Selma Khalid E. ;
Milanovic, Jovica V. .
2013 IEEE GRENOBLE POWERTECH (POWERTECH), 2013,
[13]   A model validation framework based on parameter calibration under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J].
Jiexiang Hu ;
Qi Zhou ;
Austin McKeand ;
Tingli Xie ;
Seung-Kyum Choi .
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2021, 63 :645-660
[14]   A new chance reliability-based design optimization approach considering aleatory and epistemic uncertainties [J].
Zhou, Shuang ;
Zhang, Jianguo ;
Zhang, Qingyuan ;
Wen, Meilin .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 65 (08)
[15]   Representation of analysis results involving aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J].
Helton, Jon C. ;
Johnson, Jay D. ;
Oberkampf, William L. ;
Sallaberry, Cedric J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 2010, 39 (06) :605-646
[16]   Multiphase Degradation Modeling and Remaining Useful Life Prediction Considering Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty [J].
Cao, Xuerui ;
Peng, Kaixiang .
IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (22) :27757-27770
[17]   Reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty [J].
Nannapaneni, Saideep ;
Mahadevan, Sankaran .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 155 :9-20
[18]   Reliability analysis of a nonlinear rotor/stator contact system in the presence of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J].
Yang, Lechang ;
He, Ketai ;
Guo, Yanling .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (09) :4089-4101
[19]   High-cycle fatigue life prediction for fan blades considering aleatory and epistemic uncertainty with random damage [J].
Zhang, Xiaodong ;
Wu, Dengyu ;
Deng, Zhenhong ;
Wang, Siqi ;
Feng, Wujun ;
Luo, Huageng ;
Zhang, Baoqiang .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2025, 262
[20]   Load factor in case of separating aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty [J].
Specialized Structural Group, Taisei Corporation, Japan .
J. Struct. Constr. Eng., 2008, 630 (1245-1250) :1245-1250