TRANSHUMANISM, THEOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, AND MODERN BIOLOGICAL TAXONOMY

被引:8
作者
Dumsday, Travis [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ Edmonton, Dept Philosophy & Religious Studies, Theol & Philosophy Sci, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
ZYGON | 2017年 / 52卷 / 03期
关键词
biology; taxonomy; theological anthropology; transhumanism; NATURAL KINDS; ESSENTIALISM; EVOLUTION; TAXA;
D O I
10.1111/zygo.12346
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
I examine the ways in which the theological and philosophical debate surrounding transhumanism might profit by a detailed engagement with contemporary biology, in particular with the mainline accounts of species and speciation. After a short introduction, I provide a very brief primer on species concepts and speciation in contemporary biological taxonomy. Then in a third section (titled "Implications for Technological Alteration of Species") I draw out some implications for the prospects of our being able intentionally to intervene in human evolution for the production of new species out of Homo sapiens. In a fourth section (titled " How Does the Biological Conception of Homosapiens Relate to a Philosophical (or Theological) Account of Human Nature? And Where Does This Leave Transhumanism?") I bring in the debate over the proper relationship between biological and theological conceptions of human nature, laying out the major options available (in light of Ian Barbour's fourfold categorization schema) and considering their possible implications for our understanding of transhumanism. In a fifth section (titled "Potential Applications to Specific Subdisciplines of Theology") several concrete examples are drawn out pertaining to particular subdisciplines within theology (hamartiology, soteriology, and eschatology). I conclude by briefly laying out some suggestions for future work, focusing on tasks that theologians specifically ought to pursue.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 622
页数:22
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1976, EVOLUTION DIVERSITY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, HUMANITYS END WHY WE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, PHYLOGENETIC PATTERN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, The Species Problem: Biological Species, Ontology, and the Metaphysics of Biology
[5]  
Barbour I. G., 1990, RELIG AGE SCI GIFFOR, V1
[6]  
Barbour Ian., 1966, ISSUES SCI RELIG
[7]  
Burdett Michael S., 2015, Eschatology and the Technological Future
[8]  
Cole-Turner Ron., 2016, The End of Adam and Eve: Theology and the Science of Human Origins
[9]   Resurrecting Biological Essentialism [J].
Devitt, Michael .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2008, 75 (03) :344-382
[10]   IS THERE STILL HOPE FOR A SCHOLASTIC ONTOLOGY OF BIOLOGICAL SPECIES? [J].
Dumsday, Travis .
THOMIST, 2012, 76 (03) :371-395