ON ECOLOGICAL STUDIES: A SHORT COMMUNICATION

被引:14
作者
Hart, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Sherman Coll Chiropract, Spartanburg, SC 29304 USA
关键词
Epidemiologic research designs; Ecological studies; Case control studies; Environment and public health; ASSOCIATION; MORTALITY; DISEASE; CANCER;
D O I
10.2203/dose-response.10-046.Hart
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The typical objective of research is to try and identify cause-and-effect relationships. As with any research design, there are strengths and weaknesses involved in trying to achieve this objective. Some study designs are stronger than others in attempting to establish cause-and-effect associations. The task of establishing cause-and-effect relationships is challenging (Hill, 1965) and any study that does not include experimentation, that is by manipulating a variable's exposure, is inhibited from drawing causal inferences (Heath, 1995). Similarly, statistical significance is also based on probability rather than certainty. This article focuses on a particular research design, namely, the ecological study, and attempts to serve as a reminder that the design has its place in the realm of various research designs.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 501
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INTRO CLIN RES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, STAT MODELS THEORY P, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139165495
[3]  
*CDCP, 1997, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V47, P273
[4]  
Cohen B.L., 2000, TECHNOLOGY, V7, P657
[5]   ECOLOGICAL VERSUS CASE-CONTROL STUDIES FOR TESTING A LINEAR-NO-THRESHOLD DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP [J].
COHEN, BL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 19 (03) :680-684
[6]  
Friis R.H., 2004, EPIDEMIOLOGY PUBLIC, V3rd
[7]  
FRIIS RH, 2004, EPIDEMIOLOGY PUBLIC, P26
[8]   NULLIPARITY, DECADE OF 1ST BIRTH, AND BREAST-CANCER IN CONNECTICUT COHORTS, 1855 TO 1945 - AN ECOLOGICAL STUDY [J].
HAHN, RA ;
MOOLGAVKAR, SH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1989, 79 (11) :1503-1507
[9]  
HEATH D, 1995, INTRO EXPT DESIGN ST, P17
[10]   ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE - ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION [J].
HILL, AB .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1965, 58 (05) :295-+