MECHANICAL SELF-PERFORMED ORAL HYGIENE OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED RESTORATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

被引:28
作者
Louropoulou, Anna [1 ]
Slot, Dagmar E. [1 ]
Van der Weijden, Fridus [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam ACTA, Dept Periodontol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Dental implants; oral hygiene; systematic review; TOOTHBRUSH; MAINTENANCE; EFFICACY; PLAQUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.03.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
A systematic review of self-performed oral hygiene practices for optimal maintenance of dental implant-supported restorations reveals a lack of evidence to support best practices. Background The standard of the patients' home care is a key factor for long term stability of dental implants and the prevention of biological complications. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate and summarize the literature with respect to various mechanical oral hygiene modalities around implant-supported restorations. Methods MEDLINE, Cochrane-CENTRAL and EMBASE databases were searched up to October 2013 to identify eligible studies. Five studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. Two cohort studies about powered toothbrushes and three (randomized) controlled trials comparing powered to manual toothbrushes were reviewed. All studies showed an improvement in the clinical parameters over time. Powered toothbrushes were found to perform better than manual toothbrushes but no firm conclusions can be made between treatment modalities. Conclusions There is a lack of evidence with respect to effective and optimal self-performed oral hygiene around dental implants. At present, home care recommendations are based on the knowledge that is available with respect to cleaning of natural teeth. It becomes evident that there is an urgent need for academic institutions and industry to initiate and support high quality randomized controlled clinical trials on this topic in the near future.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Comparison of oral hygiene efficacy of one manual and two electric toothbrushes
    Aass, AM
    Gjermo, P
    [J]. ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 58 (04) : 166 - 170
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, J WILEY
  • [3] [Anonymous], SPEC CARE DENT
  • [4] Bauman G R, 1991, Compendium, V12, ppassim
  • [5] Cagna David R, 2011, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V32, P84
  • [6] Effectiveness of different interdental brushes on cleaning the interproximal surfaces of teeth and implants: a randomized controlled, double-blind cross-over study
    Chongcharoen, Nardnadda
    Lulic, Martina
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (05) : 635 - 640
  • [7] Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
    Egger, M
    Smith, GD
    Schneider, M
    Minder, C
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109): : 629 - 634
  • [8] Eskow R N, 1999, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V20, P137
  • [9] Prevalence and risk variables for peri-implant disease in Brazilian subjects
    Ferreira, S. D.
    Silva, G. L. M.
    Cortelli, J. R.
    Costa, J. E.
    Costa, F. O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 33 (12) : 929 - 935
  • [10] GRADE:: going from evidence to recommendations
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Kunz, Regina
    Falck-Ytter, Yngve
    Vist, Gunn E.
    Liberati, Alessandro
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7652): : 1049 - 1051