Machine learning for lymph node metastasis prediction of in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
作者
Li, Yilin [1 ]
Xie, Fengjiao [1 ]
Xiong, Qin [1 ]
Lei, Honglin [1 ]
Feng, Peimin [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Machine learning; gastric cancer; lymph node metastasis; systematic review; meta-analysis; MULTICENTER TRIAL; TUMOR SIZE; NOMOGRAM; RISK; VALIDATION; DISSECTION; RADIOMICS; RESECTION; BIOPSY; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.946038
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine learning (ML) in predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with gastric cancer (GC) and to identify predictors applicable to the models. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 16, 2022. The pooled c-index and accuracy were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analysis was performed based on ML types. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effect models. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using PROBAST tool. Results: A total of 41 studies (56182 patients) were included, and 33 of the studies divided the participants into a training set and a test set, while the rest of the studies only had a training set. The c-index of ML for LNM prediction in training set and test set was 0.837 [95%CI (0.814, 0.859)] and 0.811 [95%CI (0.785-0.838)], respectively. The pooled accuracy was 0.781 [(95%CI (0.756-0.805)] in training set and 0.753 [95%CI (0.721-0.783)] in test set. Subgroup analysis for different ML algorithms and staging of GC showed no significant difference. In contrast, in the subgroup analysis for predictors, in the training set, the model that included radiomics had better accuracy than the model with only clinical predictors (F = 3.546, p = 0.037). Additionally, cancer size, depth of cancer invasion and histological differentiation were the three most commonly used features in models built for prediction. Conclusion: ML has shown to be of excellent diagnostic performance in predicting the LNM of GC. One of the models covering radiomics and its ML algorithms showed good accuracy for the risk of LNM in GC. However, the results revealed some methodological limitations in the development process. Future studies should focus on refining and improving existing models to improve the accuracy of LNM prediction.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of machine learning-based MRI in the prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients
    Chen, Chen
    Qin, Yuhui
    Chen, Haotian
    Zhu, Dongyong
    Gao, Fabao
    Zhou, Xiaoyue
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [22] Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Sabbagh, Ali
    Washington, Samuel L.
    Tilki, Derya
    Hong, Julian C.
    Feng, Jean
    Valdes, Gilmer
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Wu, Jing
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Boehmer, Dirk
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Cooperberg, Matthew
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Roach, Mack
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Partin, Alan W.
    V. D'Amico, Anthony
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Mohamad, Osama
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2023, 6 (05): : 501 - 507
  • [23] The Prognostic Impact of Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in Node-negative Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Jin-yu Huang
    Ying-ying Xu
    Min Li
    Zhe Sun
    Zhi Zhu
    Yong-xi Song
    Zhi-feng Miao
    Jian-hua Wu
    Hui-mian Xu
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 20 : 3927 - 3934
  • [24] Predictors of Nonsentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rajaee, Arezoo
    Sadr-Eshkevari, Pooyan
    McMasters, Kelly M.
    Egger, Michael E.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 260 : 506 - 515
  • [25] Diagnostic accuracy of radiomics-based machine learning for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and survival prediction in gastric cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Adili, Diliyaer
    Mohetaer, Aibibai
    Zhang, Wenbin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 173
  • [26] Machine learning in the prediction of depression treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sajjadian, Mehri
    Lam, Raymond W.
    Milev, Roumen
    Rotzinger, Susan
    Frey, Benicio N.
    Soares, Claudio N.
    Parikh, Sagar V.
    Foster, Jane A.
    Turecki, Gustavo
    Muller, Daniel J.
    Strother, Stephen C.
    Farzan, Faranak
    Kennedy, Sidney H.
    Uher, Rudolf
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (16) : 2742 - 2751
  • [27] A Meta-Analysis of Internal Mammary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients
    Li, Zongtao
    Gu, Xiaomei
    Tong, Junwang
    Liu, Bingli
    Sun, Liqian
    Geo, Xiaozeng
    Jiang, Xiaohua
    ONKOLOGIE, 2013, 36 (12): : 747 - 752
  • [28] Sentinel lymph node mapping for metastasis detection in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qiao, Likui
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2020, 112 (09) : 722 - 730
  • [29] Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in the splenic hilum of gastric cancer patients: a meta-analysis
    Jun Du
    Yangchao Shen
    Wenwu Yan
    Jinguo Wang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 18
  • [30] The Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Bladder and Prostate Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis
    Woo, Sungmin
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Kim, Sang Youn
    Cho, Jeong Yeon
    Kim, Seung Hyup
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (03) : W95 - W109