Understanding the effect of disease adaptation information on general population values for hypothetical health states

被引:22
作者
McTaggart-Cowan, Helen [1 ,2 ]
Tsuchiya, Aki [3 ,4 ]
O'Cathain, Alicia [3 ]
Brazier, John [3 ]
机构
[1] Canadian Ctr Appl Res Canc Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
[2] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[3] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Sheffield, Dept Econ, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Health state values; Utility; General population; Disease adaptation; Time trade-off; UK; TRADE-OFF METHOD; PREFERENCES; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.036
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
It has been recommended that economic evaluation of healthcare technologies should use values for hypothetical health states elicited from the general population rather than patients. The drawback is the general population may not consider the possibility of adapting to the impaired state. This study explored the extent to which the general population changes their initial values, and the factors that influenced this change, after being informed with different disease adaptation techniques. Three rheumatoid arthritis states were used for illustration. General population respondents from the United Kingdom initially valued the states. An adaptation exercise followed, where they listened to recordings of patients discussing how they adapted; they then valued the same states again. The differences between the valuations were examined using t-tests. A multivariate regression model was developed to assess the factors that impacted individuals to change their initial values. After undergoing the adaptation exercise, the respondents increased their values for the rheumatoid arthritis states. Younger and healthier individuals were more likely to increase their initial values after being informed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1904 / 1912
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], GUID METH TECHN APPR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780195108248.001.0001
  • [3] Responses to standard gambles: are preferences 'well constructed'?
    Baker, R
    Robinson, A
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (01) : 37 - 48
  • [4] Should patients have a greater role in valuing health states?
    Brazier J.
    Akehurst R.
    Brennan A.
    Dolan P.
    Claxton K.
    McCabe C.
    Sculpher M.
    Tsuchyia A.
    [J]. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2005, 4 (4) : 201 - 208
  • [5] EuroQol: The current state of play
    Brooks, R
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) : 53 - 72
  • [6] Considering adaptation in preference elicitations
    Damschroder, Laura J.
    Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
    Ubel, Peter A.
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 27 (03) : 394 - 399
  • [7] The impact of considering adaptation in health state valuation
    Damschroder, LJ
    Zikmund-Fisher, BJ
    Ubel, PA
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 61 (02) : 267 - 277
  • [8] Devins G M, 1994, Adv Ren Replace Ther, V1, P251
  • [9] DIPEx Health Experiences Research Group, 2008, HLTH TALK ONL
  • [10] Dolan P, 1996, HEALTH ECON, V5, P141, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199603)5:2<141::AID-HEC189>3.0.CO