Comparative analysis of new sources of late blight resistance using phenotypic and molecular genetic approaches

被引:1
|
作者
Wulff, EG [1 ]
Gonzales, EV [1 ]
Ortega, JA [1 ]
Torres, S [1 ]
Perez, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Potato Ctr, Lima 12, Peru
来源
POTATOES - HEALTHY FOOD FOR HUMANITY: INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN BREEDING, PRODUCTION, PROTECTION AND UTILIZATION | 2003年 / 619期
关键词
candidate genes; Phytophthora infestans; QTL; Solanum; potato;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.619.2
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Fifty-one wild potato species were characterized for resistance to late blight in greenhouse experiments. Species showing promising levels of resistance were tested under field conditions. Most of the accessions showed greater than or equal to 50% susceptible individuals when tested under greenhouse conditions. The resistance of 21 species observed under greenhouse conditions was confirmed under field conditions. Population samples of two promising wild species (S. raphanifolium and S. megistacrolobum) and a QTL mapping population derived from S. berthaultii were characterized molecularly for presence of defense gene markers, toward understanding the molecular genetic basis and environmental stability of quantitative resistance. Markers originated from PAL, chalcone isomerase, cytochrome P-450, osmotin and other genes were found to be associated with quantitative resistance and/or quantitative trait loci (QTL) in the new diploid germplasm. Unique gene marker associations with resistance in wild species, with respect to advanced breeding material, suggest that the new germplasm can contribute to broadening the genetic base of resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 29
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] New sources of aphids [Aphis craccivora (Koch)] resistance in cowpea germplasm using phenotypic and molecular marker approaches
    L. O. Omoigui
    G. C. Ekeuro
    A. Y. Kamara
    L. L. Bello
    M. P. Timko
    G. O. Ogunwolu
    Euphytica, 2017, 213
  • [2] New sources of aphids [Aphis craccivora (Koch)] resistance in cowpea germplasm using phenotypic and molecular marker approaches
    Omoigui, L. O.
    Ekeuro, G. C.
    Kamara, A. Y.
    Bello, L. L.
    Timko, M. P.
    Ogunwolu, G. O.
    EUPHYTICA, 2017, 213 (08)
  • [3] Screening of Wild Potatoes Identifies New Sources of Late Blight Resistance
    Karki, Hari S.
    Jansky, Shelly H.
    Halterman, Dennis A.
    PLANT DISEASE, 2021, 105 (02) : 368 - 376
  • [4] MOLECULAR CONTROLS IN THE RESISTANCE OF POTATO TO LATE BLIGHT
    CURRIER, WW
    TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 1981, 6 (07) : 191 - 194
  • [5] Comparative genetic defence analysis using microsatellite markers and anatomical resistance of potato cultivars to early blight
    Alizadeh-Moghaddam, Giti
    Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi
    Nasr-Esfahani, Arman
    Sedaghatfar, Ezatollah
    Rahanandeh, Hadi
    Yazdi, Mohammad Javad
    PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2024, 133
  • [6] New source of resistance to Aphis gossypii in Tunisian melon accessions using phenotypic and molecular marker approaches
    Chikh-Rouhou, H.
    Ben Belgacem, A. M.
    Sta-Baha, R.
    Tarchoun, N.
    Gomez-Guillamon, M. L.
    PHYTOPARASITICA, 2019, 47 (03) : 405 - 413
  • [7] New source of resistance to Aphis gossypii in Tunisian melon accessions using phenotypic and molecular marker approaches
    H. Chikh-Rouhou
    A. M. Ben Belgacem
    R. Sta-Baba
    N. Tarchoun
    M. L. Gómez-Guillamón
    Phytoparasitica, 2019, 47 : 405 - 413
  • [8] Genetic analysis of resistance to tomato late blight in Solanum pimpinellifolium accession PI 163245
    Ohlson, Erik W.
    Foolad, Majid R.
    PLANT BREEDING, 2016, 135 (03) : 391 - 398
  • [9] New Markers for Potato Late Blight Resistance and Susceptibility Using FTIR Spectroscopy
    Taoutaou, Abdelmoumen
    Socaciu, Carmen
    Pamfil, Doru
    Fetea, Florinela
    Balazs, Erika
    Botez, Constantin
    NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2012, 40 (01) : 150 - 154
  • [10] New sources of resistance to gummy stem blight in watermelon
    Gusmini, G
    Song, RH
    Wehner, TC
    CROP SCIENCE, 2005, 45 (02) : 582 - 588