Challenging the scientific basis of the Paris climate agreement

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the scientific basis of the Paris climate agreement. Design/methodology/approach The analyses are based on the IPCC's own reports, the observed temperatures versus the IPCC model-calculated temperatures and the warming effects of greenhouse gases based on the critical studies of climate sensitivity (CS). Findings The future emission and temperature trends are calculated according to a baseline scenario by the IPCC, which is the worst-case scenario RCP8.5. The selection of RCP8.5 can be criticized because the present CO2 growth rate 2.2 ppmy(-1) should be 2.8 times greater, meaning a CO2 increase from 402 to 936 ppm. The emission target scenario of COP21 is 40 GtCO(2) equivalent, and the results of this study confirm that the temperature increase stays below 2 degrees C by 2100 per the IPCC calculations. The IPCC-calculated temperature for 2016 is 1.27 degrees C, 49 per cent higher than the observed average of 0.85 degrees C in 2000. Originality/value Two explanations have been identified for this significant difference in the IPCC's calculations: The model is too sensitive for CO2 increase, and the positive water feedback does not exist. The CS of 0.6 degrees C found in some critical research studies means that the temperature increase would stay below the 2 degrees C target, even though the emissions would follow the baseline scenario. This is highly unlikely because the estimated conventional oil and gas reserves would be exhausted around the 2060s if the present consumption rate continues.