Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of POGIL in a Large-Enrollment General Chemistry Course

被引:30
作者
Vincent-Ruz, Paulette [1 ]
Meyer, Tara [2 ]
Roe, Sean G. [2 ]
Schunn, Christian D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Phys, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Chem, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Learning Res & Dev Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Upper-Division Undergraduate; Chemical Education Research; Inquiry-Based/Discovery Learning; COLORADO LEARNING ATTITUDES; SCIENCE SURVEY; SELF-CONCEPT; STUDENTS; ACHIEVEMENT; SUCCESS; GRADES; SAT;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01052
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) is a specific type of active learning centered on a learning cycle where students first explore a concept through scientific models, followed by a concept invention, and finally a concept application phase. In spite of POGIL's research-based design and the many studies showing it increases learning outcomes, there is still a critical gap in the knowledge behind the effect of POGIL in attitudinal factors and the mechanisms behind it. The current study seeks to build an understanding of the mechanistic ways in which POGIL works and its effect on students' attitudes and learning. The sample consisted of students who enrolled in General Chemistry I in the Fall semester across 7 sections (classrooms) at an R1 (large research) university in the eastern part of the US. Four sections used POGIL instruction (N = 809) while the other three used Traditional teaching methods (N = 543). Statistical models using multilevel statistics show students in the POGIL condition had higher chemistry identity, competency beliefs, and chemistry grades. Furthermore, performance in General Chemistry I appeared to be a core mediator of all the observed differences in General Chemistry II where students in the POGIL condition still performed better and had higher chemistry-related attitudes.
引用
收藏
页码:1228 / 1238
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Teaching the nature of science through scientific errors
    Allchin, Douglas
    [J]. SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2012, 96 (05) : 904 - 926
  • [2] Allen JD., 2005, CLEARING HOUSE J ED, V78, P218, DOI [10.3200/tchs.78.5.218-223, DOI 10.3200/TCHS.78.5.218-223]
  • [3] Stand and Deliver: Effects of Boston's Charter High Schools on College Preparation, Entry, and Choice
    Angrist, Joshua D.
    Cohodes, Sarah R.
    Dynarski, Susan M.
    Pathak, Parag A.
    Walters, Christopher R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2016, 34 (02) : 275 - 318
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, PROCESS ORIENTED GUI, DOI DOI 10.1021/BK-2008-0994.CH020
  • [5] [Anonymous], ETS RES REPORT SERIE
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2019, POGIL INTRO PROCESS
  • [7] It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms
    Baepler, Paul
    Walker, J. D.
    Driessen, Michelle
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2014, 78 : 227 - 236
  • [8] Barbera J, 2008, J CHEM EDUC, V85, P1435
  • [9] The Learning Benefits of Being Willing and Able to Engage in Scientific Argumentation
    Bathgate, Meghan
    Crowell, Amanda
    Schunn, Christian
    Cannady, Mac
    Dorph, Rena
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2015, 37 (10) : 1590 - 1612
  • [10] Beyond "student attitudes": Chemistry self-concept inventory for assessment of the affective component of student learning
    Bauer, CF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 82 (12) : 1864 - 1870