Nurse educators perceptions of simulation teaching in Chinese context: benefits and barriers

被引:8
作者
Luo, Dan [1 ]
Yang, Bing-Xiang [1 ]
Liu, Qian [1 ]
Xu, Aijing [1 ]
Fang, Yaxuan [2 ]
Wang, Ailing [1 ]
Yu, Sihong [1 ]
Li, Ting [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Sch Nursing, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Simulation; Nursing education; Faculty perception; Implementation; FRAMEWORK STATE; STUDENTS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.11519
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. Although simulated teaching was introduced to China in the 1990s, it remains underused in nursing education. Determining how Chinese nurse educators feel about using simulation in their institutions is very important for faculty training and has the potential to influence simulation implementation. Method. This cross-sectional descriptive study was undertaken to identify the nurse educators' experiences in the use of simulation from various regions of China. One hundred and thirty-six nurse educators provided demographic data and information about simulation implementation within their institutions and explored the perceived barriers and benefits of simulation usage. Results. The survey data shows that 108 participants have used simulation in their work, but less than 92 (67.6%) of the respondents had used this teaching strategy more than ten times in last year. The study identified four factors hindering nurse faculty from simulation adoption: (1) concerns with student readiness; (2) the need for faculty team-building for simulation teaching; (3) lack of adequate simulation resources; and (4) thoughtful integration of simulation into nursing curricula. Conclusions. Study data suggest that faculty training programs for simulation should be based on the nurse educators' training needs, including systematically designed training topics, and the provision of hands-on learning simulation activities with expert feedback to help nurse educators achieve the competencies required for effective simulation-based education.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   A Systematic Review of the Literature Related to the NLN/Jeffries Simulation Framework [J].
Adamson, Katie .
NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 36 (05) :281-291
[2]   Barriers and enablers to the use of high-fidelity patient simulation manikins in nurse education: an integrative review [J].
Al-Ghareeb, Amal Z. ;
Cooper, Simon J. .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2016, 36 :281-286
[3]  
Anderson M., 2012, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, V8, pe59, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ECNS.2010.07.002
[4]   Quality indicators for the design and implementation of simulation experiences: A Delphi study [J].
Arthur, Carol ;
Leyett-Jones, Tracy ;
Kable, Ashley .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2013, 33 (11) :1357-1361
[5]  
Bentley Regina, 2011, J Prof Nurs, V27, pe1, DOI 10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.08.009
[6]   Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard V: Facilitator [J].
Boese, Teri ;
Cato, Mary ;
Gonzalez, Laura ;
Jones, Amy ;
Kennedy, Karen ;
Reese, Cynthia ;
Decker, Sharon ;
Franklin, Ashley E. ;
Gloe, Donna ;
Lioce, Lori ;
Meakim, Colleen ;
Sando, Carol R. ;
Borum, Jimmie C. .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2013, 9 (06) :S22-S25
[7]   Best practice in clinical simulation education are we there yet? A cross-sectional survey of simulation in Australian and New Zealand pre-registration nursing education [J].
Bogossian, Fiona ;
Cooper, Simon ;
Kelly, Michelle ;
Levett-Jones, Tracy ;
McKenna, Lisa ;
Slark, Julia ;
Seaton, Philippa .
COLLEGIAN, 2018, 25 (03) :327-334
[8]  
Cheng Y, 2015, QUALITATIVE RES EVAL, V50, P36
[9]   Effect of Faculty Training on Improving the Consistency of Student Assessment and Debriefing in Clinical Simulation [J].
Cockerham, Mary Ellen .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2015, 11 (01) :64-71
[10]  
Cuchna J.W., 2019, Athletic Training Education Journal, V14, P48, DOI [DOI 10.4085/140148, 10.4085/140148]