Social Scientists Operating in the Law: A Case Study of Family Assessment Experts in the Australian Family Law System

被引:3
|
作者
Rathus, Zoe [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Law Sch, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
关键词
SCIENCE; VIOLENCE; RECOMMENDATIONS; MEANINGS; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1093/lawfam/ebab051
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Although the role of social science research in the family law system has been the subject of scholarly research for some time, less attention has been paid to how operating within the legal system might influence the work of social science and related expert witnesses who perform in that space. This article reports on interviews with family report writers, social science or similar expert witnesses, who provide assessments for the Australian family courts in contested cases about post-separation children's arrangements. It explores the impact of the law, or how those professionals perceive the law is applied, and the complexity of the family law system on these expert witnesses, particularly when working with families with allegations of domestic and family violence. The study shows that the participants are deeply acculturated to the legal system. They know how to speak its language and are aware of the different audiences they speak to including the court, the lawyers and the parents. Although an understanding of the legal context is essential for expert witnesses, the study suggests that the legal system, and their experience of it, may influence their assessment framework, affect their recommendations, and consequently impact parenting orders. Although this article investigates the situation in Australia, the results raise questions for similar family law jurisdictions which rely on family assessment reports.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Madness in Family Law: Mothers' Mental Health in the Australian Family Law System
    McInnes, Elspeth
    PSYCHIATRY PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW, 2014, 21 (01) : 78 - 91
  • [2] Operationalizing therapeutic jurisprudence in the family law system
    Lux, Glenda
    Amundson, Jon
    JUVENILE AND FAMILY COURT JOURNAL, 2024, 75 (01) : 5 - 20
  • [3] REVITALIZING THE ADVERSARY SYSTEM IN FAMILY LAW
    Murphy, Jane C.
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI LAW REVIEW, 2010, 78 (03) : 891 - 927
  • [4] ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM OF DIRECT CROSS-EXAMINATION IN AUSTRALIAN FAMILY LAW PROCEEDINGS
    Wangmann, Jane
    Kaye, Miranda
    Booth, Tracey
    UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES LAW JOURNAL, 2022, 45 (04): : 1415 - 1448
  • [5] 'Talk to Us, Not About Us': Children's Understandings and Experiences of Participation in Australian Family Law
    Dimopoulos, Georgina
    Hew, Eliza
    Vosz, Meaghan
    Walsh, Helen
    CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK, 2025,
  • [6] Are child custody evaluations beneficial to family law judges? A study from the judicial perspective
    Axelson, Tammi
    Gentile, Jennifer
    FAMILY COURT REVIEW, 2024, 62 (01) : 194 - 211
  • [7] The use and misuse of 'everyday' communication technologies in a family law setting: an exploratory study of post-separation experiences
    Heard, Genevieve
    Zeleznikow, John
    Maxwell, Christina
    Evered-Wilson, Elisabeth
    Bickerdike, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW, 2024, 46 (03) : 306 - 325
  • [8] Using Social Network Analysis to Monitor and Assess the Effectiveness of Knowledge Brokers at Connecting Scientists and Decision-Makers: An Australian case study
    Cvitanovic, C.
    Cunningham, R.
    Dowd, A-M.
    Howden, S. M.
    van Putten, E. I.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2017, 27 (03) : 256 - 269