Risks associated with Logistics 4.0 and their minimization using Blockchain

被引:34
作者
Kodym, Oldrich [1 ]
Kubac, Lukas [2 ]
Kavka, Libor [3 ]
机构
[1] Coll Logist, Dept Master Studies, Prerov 75002, Czech Republic
[2] Tech Univ Ostrava, Dept Control Syst & Instrumentat, Ostrava 70833, Czech Republic
[3] Coll Logist, Dept Bachelor Studies, Prerov 75002, Czech Republic
关键词
Logistics; 4.0; risks; risk management;
D O I
10.1515/eng-2020-0017
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Currently we are saying that we are at the dawn of the fourth revolution, which is marked by using cyber-physical systems and the Internet of Things. This is marked as Industry 4.0 (I4.0). With Industry 4.0 is also closely linked concept Logistics 4.0. The highly dynamic and uncertain logistic markets and huge logistic networks require new methods, products and services. The concept of the Internet of Things and Services (IoT&S), Big Data/Data Mining (DM), cloud computing, 3D printing, Blockchain and cyber physical system (CPS) etc. seem to be the probable technical solution for that. However, associated risks hamper its implementation and lack a comprehensive overview. In response, the paper proposes a framework of risks in the context of Logistics 4.0. They are here economic risks, that are associated e.g. with high or false investments. From a social perspective, risks the job losses, are considered too. Additionally, risks can be associated with technical risks, e.g. technical integration, information technology (IT)-related risks such as data security, and legal and political risks, such as for instance unsolved legal clarity in terms of data possession. It is therefore necessary to know the potential risks in the implementation process.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 85
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Sustainability Aspects of a Digitalized Industry - A Comparative Study from China and Germany [J].
Beier, Grischa ;
Niehoff, Silke ;
Ziems, Tilla ;
Xue, Bing .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRECISION ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING-GREEN TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 4 (02) :227-234
[2]  
Berg HP, 2010, RELIABILITY RISK ANA, P1
[3]  
Dickson G, 1995, PRINCIPLES RISK MANA
[4]   Organisational learning and leadership styles in healthcare organisations An exploratory case study [J].
Franco, Mario ;
Almeida, Joana .
LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (7-8) :782-806
[5]  
Gajbhiye A, 2014, 2014 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE CONFLUENCE THE NEXT GENERATION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUMMIT (CONFLUENCE), P1, DOI 10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2014.6949224
[6]   A critical review on supply chain risk - Definition, measure and modeling [J].
Heckmann, Iris ;
Comes, Tina ;
Nickel, Stefan .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 52 :119-132
[7]  
Henning K., 2013, Acatech - National Academy of Science and Engineering
[8]  
Heuser L.C., 2009, ICT SHAPING WORLD SC
[9]  
Holbl M., 2011, CLOUD COMPUTING SECU, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-11196-0_55
[10]  
International Organization for Standardisation, 2009, Risk Management-Vocabulary