Comparison of the Xpert MTB/RIF Test with an IS6110-TaqMan Real-Time PCR Assay for Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Respiratory and Nonrespiratory Specimens

被引:140
|
作者
Armand, Sylvie [1 ]
Vanhuls, Pascale [1 ]
Delcroix, Guy [1 ]
Courcol, Rene [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lemaitre, Nadine [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille Nord France, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] UDSL, F-59000 Lille, France
[4] INSERM, U1019, F-59021 Lille, France
[5] Ctr Natl Rech Sci, UMR8204, F-59021 Lille, France
关键词
ACID AMPLIFICATION TESTS; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; PULMONARY; PERFORMANCE; COMPLEX; DNA;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.02157-10
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The sensitivities of the Xpert MTB/RIF test and an in-house IS6110-based real-time PCR using TaqMan probes (IS6110-TaqMan assay) for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) DNA were compared by use of 117 clinical specimens (97 culture positive and 20 culture negative for MTBC) that were frozen in sediment. The 97 clinical specimens included 60 respiratory and 37 nonrespiratory specimens distributed into 36 smear-positive and 61 smear-negative specimens. Among the 97 culture-positive specimens, 4 had rifampin-resistant isolates. Both methods were highly specific and exhibited excellent sensitivity (100%) with smear-positive specimens. The sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF test with the whole smear-negative specimens was more reduced than that of the IS6110-TaqMan assay (48 versus 69%, P = 0.005). Both methods exhibited similar sensitivities with smear-negative respiratory specimens, but the Xpert MTB/RIF test had lower sensitivity with smear-negative nonrespiratory specimens than the IS6110-TaqMan assay (37 versus 71%, P = 0.013). Finally, the sensitivities of the Xpert MTB/RIF test and the IS6110-TaqMan assay were 79% and 84%, respectively, with respiratory specimens and 53% and 78%, respectively (P = 0.013), with nonrespiratory specimens. The Xpert MTB/RIF test correctly detected the rifampin resistance in smear-positive specimens but not in the one smear-negative specimen. The Xpert MTB/RIF test is a simple rapid method well adapted to a routine laboratory that appeared to be as sensitive as the IS6110-TaqMan assay with respiratory specimens but less sensitive with paucibacillary specimens, such as smear-negative nonrespiratory specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:1772 / 1776
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Comparison of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay and Real-time PCR for the Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
    Kim, Min Jin
    Nam, You Sun
    Cho, Sun Young
    Park, Tae Sung
    Lee, Hee Joo
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE, 2015, 45 (03) : 327 - 332
  • [2] Evaluation of the Cobas TaqMan MTB real-time PCR assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens
    Lee, Meng-Rui
    Chung, Kuei-Pin
    Wang, Hao-Chien
    Lin, Chih-Bin
    Yu, Chong-Jen
    Lee, Jen-Jyh
    Hsueh, Po-Ren
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 62 : 1160 - 1164
  • [3] Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in paucibacillary sputum: performances of the Xpert MTB/RIF ultra compared to the Xpert MTB/RIF, and IS6110 PCR
    Kolia-Diafouka, P.
    Carrere-Kremer, S.
    Lounnas, M.
    Bourdin, A.
    Kremer, L.
    Van de Perre, P.
    Godreuil, S.
    Tuaillon, E.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 94 (04) : 365 - 370
  • [4] Comparison of Xpert MTB/RIF with ProbeTec ET DTB and COBAS TaqMan MTB for direct detection of M. tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens
    Uladzimir Antonenka
    Sabine Hofmann-Thiel
    Laziz Turaev
    Ainura Esenalieva
    Mokhonim Abdulloeva
    Evgeni Sahalchyk
    Tarig Alnour
    Harald Hoffmann
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 13
  • [5] Comparison of the Purelyse®-IS6110 nested PCR with the Xpert® MTB/RIF test in clinical samples with suspected tuberculosis
    German Lemus-Minor, Carlos
    Fernando Ovalle-Marroqui, Diego
    Gustavo Vazquez-Jimenez, J.
    Laura Reales-Aguero, Diana
    Michelle Sepulveda-Alcantara, Perla
    Rene Rodriguez-Sanchez, Jesus
    Diaz-Molina, Raul
    Rene Machado-Contreras, Jesus
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2018, 152 : 48 - 51
  • [6] Evaluation of Xpert® MTB/RIF technique for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex detection in extra-respiratory specimens
    Garcia, Patricia
    Elvira Balcells, M.
    Castillo, Claudia
    Miranda, Carolina
    Geoffroy, Enrique
    Roman, Juan C.
    Wozniak, Aniela
    REVISTA CHILENA DE INFECTOLOGIA, 2017, 34 (04): : 333 - 339
  • [7] Accuracy of Xpert® MTB/RIF assay compared with AdvanSure™ TB/NTM real-time PCR using bronchoscopy specimens
    Ko, Y.
    Lee, H-K.
    Lee, Y. S.
    Kim, M-Y.
    Shin, J. H.
    Shim, E-J.
    Park, S. Y.
    Mo, E. K.
    Park, Y. B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2016, 20 (01) : 115 - U177
  • [8] Comparison of Xpert MTB/RIF with Line Probe Assay for Detection of Rifampin-Monoresistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
    Rufai, Syed Beenish
    Kumar, Parveen
    Singh, Amit
    Prajapati, Suneel
    Balooni, Veena
    Singh, Sarman
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 52 (06) : 1846 - 1852
  • [9] Comparison of the real-time polymerase chain reaction and xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin assay for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
    Abd-Elaziz, Nada F.
    Salem, Heba A.
    Nagy, Hala M.
    Farhat, Amgad A.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CHEST DISEASES AND TUBERCULOSIS, 2024, 73 (02): : 136 - 145
  • [10] Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis
    Zheng, Hong
    Zhong, Fangming
    Yu, Guocan
    Shen, Yanqin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 40 (05) : 969 - 977