Respiratory Variation in Carotid Artery Peak Systolic Velocity Is Unable to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Patients When Assessed by Novice Physician Sonologists

被引:6
作者
Abbasi, Adeel [1 ]
Nayeemuddin, Mohammed [1 ]
Azab, Nader [1 ]
Schick, Alexandra [2 ]
Lopardo, Thomas [3 ]
Phillips, Gary S. [4 ]
Merchant, Roland C. [5 ,6 ]
Levy, Mitchell M. [1 ]
Blaivas, Michael [7 ]
Corl, Keith A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Dept Med, Warren Alpert Sch Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Sch Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Ctr Biostat, Dept Biomed Informat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Brown Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Univ South Carolina, St Francis Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Columbus, GA USA
关键词
fluid responsiveness; point-of-care ultrasound; carotid ultrasound; respiratory variation in carotid artery peak systolic velocity; carotid Delta Vpeak; CORRECTED FLOW TIME; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; VENA-CAVA COLLAPSIBILITY; SEVERE SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; DOPPLER; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1177/0885066620934392
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Respiratory variation in carotid artery peak systolic velocity (Delta Vpeak) assessed by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been proposed as a noninvasive means to predict fluid responsiveness. We aimed to evaluate the ability of carotid Delta Vpeak as assessed by novice physician sonologists to predict fluid responsiveness. Methods: This study was conducted in 2 intensive care units. Spontaneously breathing, nonintubated patients with signs of volume depletion were included. Patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter, cardiogenic, obstructive or neurogenic shock, or those for whom further intravenous (IV) fluid administration would be harmful were excluded. Three novice physician sonologists were trained in POCUS assessment of carotid Delta Vpeak. They assessed the carotid Delta Vpeak in study participants prior to the administration of a 500 mL IV fluid bolus. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a >= 10% increase in cardiac index as measured using bioreactance. Results: Eighty-six participants were enrolled, 50 (58.1%) were fluid responders. Carotid Delta Vpeak performed poorly at predicting fluid responsiveness. Test characteristics for the optimum carotid Delta Vpeak of 8.0% were: area under the receiver operating curve = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.48-0.73), sensitivity = 72.0% (95% CI: 58.3-82.56), specificity = 50.0% (95% CI: 34.5-65.5). Conclusions: Novice physician sonologists using POCUS are unable to predict fluid responsiveness using carotid Delta Vpeak. Until further research identifies key limiting factors, clinicians should use caution directing IV fluid resuscitation using carotid Delta Vpeak.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 892
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Does inferior vena cava respiratory variability predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients?
    Airapetian, Norair
    Maizel, Julien
    Alyamani, Ola
    Mahjoub, Yazine
    Lorne, Emmanuel
    Levrard, Melanie
    Ammenouche, Nacim
    Seydi, Aziz
    Tinturier, Francois
    Lobjoie, Eric
    Dupont, Herve
    Slama, Michel
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 19
  • [2] Ultrasound Assessment of the Change in Carotid Corrected Flow Time in Fluid Responsiveness in Undifferentiated Shock
    Barjaktarevic, Igor
    Toppen, William E.
    Hu, Scott
    Montoya, Elizabeth Aquije
    Ong, Stephanie
    Buhr, Russell
    David, Ian J.
    Wang, Tisha
    Rezayat, Talayeh
    Chang, Steven Y.
    Elashoff, David
    Markovic, Daniela
    Berlin, David
    Cannesson, Maxime
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (11) : E1040 - E1046
  • [3] Correlation of corrected flow time in the carotid artery with changes in intravascular volume status
    Blehar, David J.
    Glazier, Scott
    Gaspari, Romolo J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 29 (04) : 486 - 488
  • [4] Respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter: surrogate of central venous pressure or parameter of fluid responsiveness? Let the physiology reply
    Bodson, Laurent
    Vieillard-Baron, Antoine
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 16 (06):
  • [5] Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality
    Boyd, John H.
    Forbes, Jason
    Nakada, Taka-aki
    Walley, Keith R.
    Russell, James A.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (02) : 259 - 265
  • [6] Cardiorespiratory Interactions: The Relationship Between Mechanical Ventilation and Hemodynamics
    Cheifetz, Ira M.
    [J]. RESPIRATORY CARE, 2014, 59 (12) : 1937 - 1945
  • [7] Corl KA, 2019, J INTENSIVE CARE MED, p885066619881123
  • [8] Inferior vena cava collapsibility detects fluid responsiveness among spontaneously breathing critically-ill patients
    Corl, Keith A.
    George, Naomi R.
    Romanoff, Justin
    Levinson, Andrew T.
    Chheng, Darin B.
    Merchant, Roland C.
    Levy, Mitchell M.
    Napoli, Anthony M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 41 : 130 - 137
  • [9] RELIABILITY, LATERALITY AND THE EFFECT OF RESPIRATION ON THE MEASURED CORRECTED FLOW TIME OF THE CAROTID ARTERIES
    Doctor, Michael
    Siadecki, Sebastian D.
    Cooper, Denrick, Jr.
    Rose, Gabriel
    Drake, Aaran B.
    Ku, Melvin
    Suprun, Maria
    Saul, Turandot
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (01) : 91 - 97
  • [10] Respiratory variation in carotid peak systolic velocity predicts volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock: a prospective cohort study
    Ibarra-Estrada M.Á.
    López-Pulgarín J.A.
    Mijangos-Méndez J.C.
    Díaz-Gómez J.L.
    Aguirre-Avalos G.
    [J]. Critical Ultrasound Journal, 2015, 7 (1)