Comparison of the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts and composite resin cores with different post lenghts

被引:19
作者
do Valle, Accacio Lins [1 ]
Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo [1 ]
Shiratori, Fabio Kenji [1 ]
Pegoraro, Luiz Fernando [1 ]
Bonfante, Gerson [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
post and core technique; composite resins; fracture stress;
D O I
10.1590/S1678-77572007000100007
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: This study evaluated the fracture strengths of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts with different post lengths. Material and methods. Thirty freshly extracted canines were endodontically treated. They were randomly divided into groups of 10 teeth and prepared according to 3 experimental protocols, as follows; Group 1/3 PP: teeth restored with prefabricated post and composite resin core (Z250) with post length of 5.0mm; Group 1/2 PP and Group 2/3 PP: teeth restored with prefabricated post and composite resin core (Z250) with different combinations of post length of 7.5mm and 10mm, respectively. All teeth were restored with full metal crowns. The fracture resistance (N) was measured in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed 0.5mm/min) at 45 degrees to the tooth long axis until failure. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance ((alpha=.05). Results. The one-way analysis of variance demonstrated no significant difference among the different post lengths (P >.05) (Groups 1/3 PP = 405.4 N, 1/2 PP = 395.6 N, 2/3 PP = 393.8 N). Failures occurred mainly due to core fracture. Conclusion. The results of this study showed that an increased post length in teeth restored with prefabricated posts did not significantly increase the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 32
页数:4
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Abdalla AI, 1996, AM J DENT, V9, P150
[2]   BIOMECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN RESORTING ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH [J].
ASSIF, D ;
GORFIL, C .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1994, 71 (06) :565-567
[3]  
ASSIF D, 1989, J PROSTHET DENT, V61, P676
[4]  
BARABAN DJ, 1967, DENT CLIN N AM, P633
[5]  
BEX RT, 1992, J PROSTHET DENT, V67, P768
[6]   A METHOD FOR BONDING TO DENTIN AND ENAMEL [J].
BOWEN, RL ;
COBB, EN .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 107 (05) :734-736
[7]   STRESS-DISTRIBUTION SURROUNDING ENDODONTIC POSTS [J].
BURNS, DA ;
KRAUSE, WR ;
DOUGLAS, HB ;
BURNS, DR .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1990, 64 (04) :412-418
[8]  
CAPUTO AA, 1976, DENT CLIN N AM, V20, P299
[9]   COMPARISON OF THE TORSIONAL FORCES AT FAILURE FOR 7 ENDODONTIC POST SYSTEMS [J].
COHEN, BI ;
PAGNILLO, M ;
CONDOS, S ;
DEUTSCH, AS .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1995, 74 (04) :350-357
[10]   Factors determining post selection: A literature review [J].
Fernandes, AS ;
Shetty, S ;
Coutinho, I .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 90 (06) :556-562