Comparison of Visual Field Training for Hemianopia With Active Versus Sham Transcranial Direct Cortical Stimulation

被引:76
作者
Plow, Ela B. [2 ]
Obretenova, Souzana N.
Fregni, Felipe
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro [3 ]
Merabet, Lotfi B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Dept Ophthalmol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); brain stimulation; hemianopia; visual field; rehabilitation; Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT); VISION RESTORATION THERAPY; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY; BRAIN-STIMULATION; EYE-MOVEMENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; REHABILITATION; STROKE; PLASTICITY; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1177/1545968311431963
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT) aims to improve visual field function by systematically training regions of residual vision associated with the activity of suboptimal firing neurons within the occipital cortex. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to modulate cortical excitability. Objective. Assess the possible efficacy of tDCS combined with VRT. Methods. The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, demonstration-of-concept pilot study where participants were assigned to either VRT and tDCS or VRT and sham. The anode was placed over the occipital pole to target both affected and unaffected lobes. One hour training sessions were carried out 3 times per week for 3 months in a laboratory. Outcome measures included objective and subjective changes in visual field, recording of visual fixation performance, and vision-related activities of daily living (ADLs) and quality of life (QOL). Results. Although 12 participants were enrolled, only 8 could be analyzed. The VRT and tDCS group demonstrated significantly greater expansion in visual field and improvement on ADLs compared with the VRT and sham group. Contrary to expectations, subjective perception of visual field change was greater in the VRT and sham group. QOL did not change for either group. The observed changes in visual field were unrelated to compensatory eye movements, as shown with fixation monitoring. Conclusions. The combination of occipital cortical tDCS with visual field rehabilitation appears to enhance visual functional outcomes compared with visual rehabilitation alone. TDCS may enhance inherent mechanisms of plasticity associated with training.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 626
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cognitive Training on Frontal Lobe Neurotransmitter Concentrations
    Alvarez-Alvarado, Stacey
    Boutzoukas, Emanuel M.
    Kraft, Jessica N.
    O'Shea, Andrew
    Indahlastari, Aprinda
    Albizu, Alejandro
    Nissim, Nicole R.
    Evangelista, Nicole D.
    Cohen, Ronald
    Porges, Eric C.
    Woods, Adam J.
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 13
  • [42] Stance Phase Gait Training Post Stroke Using Simultaneous Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Motor Learning-Based Virtual Reality-Assisted Therapy: Protocol Development and Initial Testing
    Salameh, Ahlam
    McCabe, Jessica
    Skelly, Margaret
    Duncan, Kelsey Rose
    Chen, Zhengyi
    Tatsuoka, Curtis
    Bikson, Marom
    Hardin, Elizabeth C.
    Daly, Janis J.
    Pundik, Svetlana
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [43] Simultaneous high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted gait training in stroke patients
    Kim, Eunmi
    Lee, Gihyoun
    Lee, Jungsoo
    Kim, Yun-Hee
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [44] Participants' experience of approach bias modification training with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a combination treatment for binge eating disorder
    Gordon, Gemma
    Williamson, Grace
    Gkofa, Vasiliki
    Schmidt, Ulrike
    Brockmeyer, Timo
    Campbell, Iain
    EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW, 2021, 29 (06) : 969 - 984
  • [45] Modulation of movement-associated cortical activation by transcranial direct current stimulation
    Stagg, C. J.
    O'Shea, J.
    Kincses, Z. T.
    Woolrich, M.
    Matthews, P. M.
    Johansen-Berg, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 30 (07) : 1412 - 1423
  • [46] A Comparison of Language Mapping by Preoperative Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Direct Cortical Stimulation During Awake Surgery
    Picht, Thomas
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    Sollmann, Nico
    Roesler, Judith
    Niraula, Birat
    Neuvonen, Tuomas
    Savolainen, Petri
    Lioumis, Pantelis
    Makela, Jyrki P.
    Deletis, Vedran
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Vajkoczy, Peter
    Ringel, Florian
    NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 (05) : 808 - 819
  • [47] Long-Lasting Enhancement of Visual Perception with Repetitive Noninvasive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Behrens, Janina R.
    Kraft, Antje
    Irlbacher, Kerstin
    Gerhardt, Holger
    Olma, Manuel C.
    Brandt, Stephan A.
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11
  • [48] Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Treadmill Training on Kinematics and Spatiotemporal Gait Variables in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study
    Dumont, Arislander Jonathan Lopes
    Cimolin, Veronica
    Parreira, Rodolfo Borges
    Armbrust, Danilo
    Fonseca, Daniela Rosana Pedro
    Fonseca, Adriano Luis
    Cordeiro, Lorraine
    Franco, Renata Calhes
    Duarte, Natalia Almeida Carvalho
    Galli, Manuela
    Oliveira, Claudia Santos
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [49] Non-invasive cortical stimulation: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
    Sudbrack-Oliveira, Pedro
    Razza, Lais B.
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    EMERGING HORIZONS IN NEUROMODULATION: NEW FRONTIERS IN BRAIN AND SPINE STIMULATION, 2021, 159 : 1 - 22
  • [50] Transcranial direct current stimulation for depression: 3-week, randomised, sham-controlled trial
    Loo, Colleen K.
    Alonzo, Angelo
    Martin, Donel
    Mitchell, Philip B.
    Galvez, Veronica
    Sachdev, Perminder
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 200 (01) : 52 - 59