Comparison of Visual Field Training for Hemianopia With Active Versus Sham Transcranial Direct Cortical Stimulation

被引:76
|
作者
Plow, Ela B. [2 ]
Obretenova, Souzana N.
Fregni, Felipe
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro [3 ]
Merabet, Lotfi B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Dept Ophthalmol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); brain stimulation; hemianopia; visual field; rehabilitation; Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT); VISION RESTORATION THERAPY; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY; BRAIN-STIMULATION; EYE-MOVEMENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; REHABILITATION; STROKE; PLASTICITY; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1177/1545968311431963
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT) aims to improve visual field function by systematically training regions of residual vision associated with the activity of suboptimal firing neurons within the occipital cortex. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to modulate cortical excitability. Objective. Assess the possible efficacy of tDCS combined with VRT. Methods. The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, demonstration-of-concept pilot study where participants were assigned to either VRT and tDCS or VRT and sham. The anode was placed over the occipital pole to target both affected and unaffected lobes. One hour training sessions were carried out 3 times per week for 3 months in a laboratory. Outcome measures included objective and subjective changes in visual field, recording of visual fixation performance, and vision-related activities of daily living (ADLs) and quality of life (QOL). Results. Although 12 participants were enrolled, only 8 could be analyzed. The VRT and tDCS group demonstrated significantly greater expansion in visual field and improvement on ADLs compared with the VRT and sham group. Contrary to expectations, subjective perception of visual field change was greater in the VRT and sham group. QOL did not change for either group. The observed changes in visual field were unrelated to compensatory eye movements, as shown with fixation monitoring. Conclusions. The combination of occipital cortical tDCS with visual field rehabilitation appears to enhance visual functional outcomes compared with visual rehabilitation alone. TDCS may enhance inherent mechanisms of plasticity associated with training.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 626
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Determining Electrode Placement for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Comparison of EEG- Versus TMS-Guided Methods
    Rich, Tonya L.
    Menk, Jeremiah S.
    Rudser, Kyle D.
    Chen, Mo
    Meekins, Gregg D.
    Pena, Edgar
    Feyma, Timothy
    Bawroski, Kay
    Bush, Christina
    Gillick, Bernadette T.
    CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 48 (06) : 367 - 375
  • [32] Transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with attention increases cortical excitability and improves motor learning in healthy volunteers
    Tomofumi Yamaguchi
    Kouhei Moriya
    Shigeo Tanabe
    Kunitsugu Kondo
    Yohei Otaka
    Satoshi Tanaka
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 17
  • [33] Transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with attention increases cortical excitability and improves motor learning in healthy volunteers
    Yamaguchi, Tomofumi
    Moriya, Kouhei
    Tanabe, Shigeo
    Kondo, Kunitsugu
    Otaka, Yohei
    Tanaka, Satoshi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [34] Daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) leads to greater increases in cortical excitability than second daily transcranial direct current stimulation
    Alonzo, Angelo
    Brassil, Joseph
    Taylor, Janet L.
    Martin, Donel
    Loo, Colleen K.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2012, 5 (03) : 208 - 213
  • [35] Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with robotic training in incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial
    Simis, Marcel
    Fregni, Felipe
    Battistella, Linamara R.
    SPINAL CORD SERIES AND CASES, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [36] Transcranial Pulsed-Current Stimulation versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: A Pilot, Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Double-Blind Study
    Barra, Alice
    Rosenfelder, Martin
    Mortaheb, Sepehr
    Carriere, Manon
    Martens, Geraldine
    Bodien, Yelena G.
    Morales-Quezada, Leon
    Bender, Andreas
    Laureys, Steven
    Thibaut, Aurore
    Fregni, Felipe
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [37] Improving motor performance without training: the effect of combining mirror visual feedback with transcranial direct current stimulation
    von Rein, Erik
    Hoff, Maike
    Kaminski, Elisabeth
    Sehm, Bernhard
    Steele, Christopher J.
    Villringer, Arno
    Ragert, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 113 (07) : 2383 - 2389
  • [38] Combined transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in patients with stroke: a systematic review
    Fonte, Cristina
    Varalta, Valentina
    Rocco, Arianna
    Munari, Daniele
    Filippetti, Mirko
    Evangelista, Elisa
    Modenese, Angela
    Smania, Nicola
    Picelli, Alessandro
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 39 (06) : 435 - 446
  • [39] Treatment of Primary Progressive Aphasias by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Language Training
    Cotelli, Maria
    Manenti, Rosa
    Petesi, Michela
    Brambilla, Michela
    Cosseddu, Maura
    Zanetti, Orazio
    Miniussi, Carlo
    Padovani, Alessandro
    Borroni, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2014, 39 (04) : 799 - 808
  • [40] Semantic Feature Training in Combination with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Progressive Anomia
    Hung, Jinyi
    Bauer, Ashley
    Grossman, Murray
    Hamilton, Roy H.
    Coslett, H. B.
    Reilly, Jamie
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11