Comparison of Visual Field Training for Hemianopia With Active Versus Sham Transcranial Direct Cortical Stimulation

被引:76
|
作者
Plow, Ela B. [2 ]
Obretenova, Souzana N.
Fregni, Felipe
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro [3 ]
Merabet, Lotfi B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Dept Ophthalmol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); brain stimulation; hemianopia; visual field; rehabilitation; Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT); VISION RESTORATION THERAPY; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY; BRAIN-STIMULATION; EYE-MOVEMENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; REHABILITATION; STROKE; PLASTICITY; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1177/1545968311431963
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT) aims to improve visual field function by systematically training regions of residual vision associated with the activity of suboptimal firing neurons within the occipital cortex. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to modulate cortical excitability. Objective. Assess the possible efficacy of tDCS combined with VRT. Methods. The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, demonstration-of-concept pilot study where participants were assigned to either VRT and tDCS or VRT and sham. The anode was placed over the occipital pole to target both affected and unaffected lobes. One hour training sessions were carried out 3 times per week for 3 months in a laboratory. Outcome measures included objective and subjective changes in visual field, recording of visual fixation performance, and vision-related activities of daily living (ADLs) and quality of life (QOL). Results. Although 12 participants were enrolled, only 8 could be analyzed. The VRT and tDCS group demonstrated significantly greater expansion in visual field and improvement on ADLs compared with the VRT and sham group. Contrary to expectations, subjective perception of visual field change was greater in the VRT and sham group. QOL did not change for either group. The observed changes in visual field were unrelated to compensatory eye movements, as shown with fixation monitoring. Conclusions. The combination of occipital cortical tDCS with visual field rehabilitation appears to enhance visual functional outcomes compared with visual rehabilitation alone. TDCS may enhance inherent mechanisms of plasticity associated with training.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 626
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Temporal Profile of Functional Visual Rehabilitative Outcomes Modulated by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Plow, Ela B.
    Obretenova, Souzana N.
    Jackson, Mary Lou
    Merabet, Lotfi B.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2012, 15 (04): : 367 - 373
  • [2] Compensatory visual field training for patients with hemianopia after stroke
    Nelles, G
    Esser, J
    Eckstein, A
    Tiede, A
    Gerhard, H
    Diener, HC
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2001, 306 (03) : 189 - 192
  • [3] COMPARISON OF TWO CONFIGURATIONS OF TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION FOR TREATMENT OF APHASIA
    Spielmann, Kerstin
    Van De Sandt-Koenderman, W. Mieke E.
    Heijenbrok-Kal, Majanka H.
    Ribbers, Gerard M.
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2018, 50 (06) : 527 - 533
  • [4] Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary comparison
    Geroin, Christian
    Picelli, Alessandro
    Munari, Daniele
    Waldner, Andreas
    Tomelleri, Christopher
    Smania, Nicola
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2011, 25 (06) : 537 - 548
  • [5] Impaired Motor Skill Acquisition Using Mirror Visual Feedback Improved by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
    Horiba, Mitsuya
    Ueki, Yoshino
    Nojima, Ippei
    Shimizu, Yoko
    Sahashi, Kento
    Itamoto, Shogo
    Suzuki, Ayuko
    Yamada, Gohei
    Matsukawa, Noriyuki
    Wada, Ikuo
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [6] Enhancing multisensory rehabilitation of visual field defects with transcranial direct current stimulation: A randomized clinical trial
    Diana, Lorenzo
    Casati, Carlotta
    Melzi, Lisa
    Marzoli, Stefania Bianchi
    Bolognini, Nadia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2024,
  • [7] Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: A pilot study
    Hesse, S.
    Werner, C.
    Schonhardt, E. M.
    Bardeleben, A.
    Jenrich, W.
    Kirker, S. G. B.
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 25 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [8] Sham-controlled randomized multicentre trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for prolonged disorders of consciousness
    Thibaut, Aurore
    Fregni, Felipe
    Estraneo, Anna
    Fiorenza, Salvatore
    Noe, Enrique
    Llorens, Roberto
    Ferri, Joan
    Formisano, Rita
    Morone, Giovanni
    Bender, Andreas
    Rosenfelder, Martin
    Lamberti, Gianfranco
    Kodratyeva, Ekaterina
    Kondratyev, Sergey
    Legostaeva, Liudmila
    Suponeva, Natalia
    Krewer, Carmen
    Mueller, Friedemann
    Dardenne, Nadia
    Jedidi, Haroun
    Laureys, Steven
    Gosseries, Olivia
    Lejeune, Nicolas
    Martens, Geraldine
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2023, 30 (10) : 3016 - 3031
  • [9] Comparison of Neuroplastic Responses to Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Subacute Stroke
    Nicolo, Pierre
    Magnin, Cecile
    Pedrazzini, Elena
    Plomp, Gijs
    Mottaz, Anais
    Schnider, Armin
    Guggisberg, Adrian G.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 99 (05): : 862 - 872
  • [10] Contrasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on central and peripheral visual fields
    Costa, Thiago L.
    Gualtieri, Mirella
    Barboni, Mirella T. S.
    Katayama, Rafael K.
    Boggio, Paulo S.
    Ventura, Dora F.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2015, 233 (05) : 1391 - 1397