Scaling Up? Unpacking the Effect of Deliberative Mini-Publics on Legitimacy Perceptions

被引:14
作者
Germann, Micha [1 ]
Marien, Sofie [2 ]
Muradova, Lala [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Polit Languages & Int Studies, Wessex House, Bath BA2 7AY, England
[2] Univ Leuven, Ctr Polit Sci Res, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Dept Polit & Social Sci, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
mini-publics; deliberative democracy; participatory democracy; legitimacy perceptions; procedural fairness; DEMOCRATIC PROCEDURES; POLITICAL TRUST; VOICE;
D O I
10.1177/00323217221137444
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Deliberative mini-publics are increasingly used to try to tackle public discontent with the functioning of democracy. However, the ability of mini-publics to increase perceptions of legitimate decision-making among citizens at large remains unclear, given especially that existing studies have not considered the potentially damaging effects of mini-public recommendations not being followed. We designed, pre-registered, and ran a survey experiment in Ireland to test the effects of mini-publics on legitimacy perceptions conditional on whether or not their non-binding policy recommendations are honored (N = 1309). We find that mini-publics increase legitimacy perceptions among the broader citizenry; however, these beneficial effects are largely limited to situations in which their recommendations are honored. Additional results suggest that it makes no difference whether mini-public recommendations are overturned by elected representatives or by citizens in a referendum. Finally, we find that the legitimacy-enhancing effects of participatory processes are driven by citizens with low political trust.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 700
页数:24
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Legitimacy from Decision-Making Influence and Outcome Favourability: Results from General Population Survey Experiments [J].
Arnesen, Sveinung .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2017, 65 :146-161
[2]   What can deliberative mini-publics contribute to democratic systems? [J].
Beauvais, Edana ;
Warren, Mark E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 58 (03) :893-914
[3]   Who Supports Citizens Selected by Lot to be the Main Policymakers? A Study of French Citizens [J].
Bedock, Camille ;
Pilet, Jean-Benoit .
GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION, 2021, 56 (03) :485-504
[4]   Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self-Administered Surveys [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Margolis, Michele F. ;
Sances, Michael W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 58 (03) :739-753
[5]   Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Huber, Gregory A. ;
Lenz, Gabriel S. .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (03) :351-368
[6]   Building Faith in Democracy: Deliberative Events, Political Trust and Efficacy [J].
Boulianne, Shelley .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2019, 67 (01) :4-30
[7]   Mini-publics and Public Opinion: Two Survey-Based Experiments [J].
Boulianne, Shelley .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2018, 66 (01) :119-136
[8]  
Caluwaerts D, 2018, DEMOCRATIZ STUD, P1, DOI 10.4324/9781315270890
[9]   Rhetoric and the Public Sphere Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy? [J].
Chambers, Simone .
POLITICAL THEORY, 2009, 37 (03) :323-350
[10]   A Matter of Life or Death: A Survey Experiment on the Perceived Legitimacy of Political Decision-Making on Euthanasia [J].
Christensen, Henrik Serup ;
Himmelroos, Staffan ;
Setala, Maija .
PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, 2020, 73 (03) :627-650