Why Do Physicians Order Unnecessary Preoperative Tests? A Qualitative Study

被引:1
|
作者
Brown, Steven R. [1 ]
Brown, Jaclyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Banner Good Samaritan Family Med Residency, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
ROUTINE; ANESTHESIOLOGISTS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Routine preoperative testing is ineffective and costly. We explored reasons for the continued use of unnecessary preoperative tests and approaches to limit such testing. METHODS: We interviewed 23 physicians and nurse administrators involved in preoperative decision-making in our local health care environment. We conducted interviews using a semi-structured format and analyzed the data using a template organizing style. RESULTS: Some interviewees feel routine preoperative tests are beneficial, others are ambivalent about preoperative tests in their practice, and many believe there is considerable unnecessary testing. As interviewees discussed factors that lead to the ordering of unnecessary preoperative tests, five major themes emerged: practice tradition, belief that other physicians want the tests done, medicolegal worries, concerns about surgical delays or cancellation, and lack of awareness of evidence and guidelines. Interviewees suggested that a consensus guideline, improved education, and increased collaboration between specialities could decrease unnecessary testing. CONCLUSIONS: Our qualitative findings demonstrate barriers to limiting unnecessary preoperative testing but also suggest interventions that could improve the preoperative testing process. Minimizing unnecessary preoperative tests could decrease cost, maximize quality, and improve the patient experience.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 343
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Why do nurses choose to stay silent?: A qualitative study
    Yalcin, Begum
    Baykal, Ulku
    Turkmen, Emine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (01)
  • [42] Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study
    Freeman, AC
    Sweeney, K
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7321): : 1100 - 1102A
  • [43] Variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic
    Harrod, Molly
    Kowalski, Christine P.
    Saint, Sanjay
    Forman, Jane
    Krein, Sarah L.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
  • [44] Exploring why European primary care physicians sometimes do not think of, or act on, a possible cancer diagnosis. A qualitative study
    Hajdarevic, Senada
    Hogberg, Cecilia
    Marzo-Castillejo, Merce
    Silina, Vija
    Sawicka-Powierza, Jolanta
    Esteva, Magadalena
    Koskela, Tuomas
    Petek, Davorina
    Contreras-Martos, Sara
    Mangione, Marcello
    Adzic, Zlata Ozvacic
    Asenova, Radost
    Babic, Svjetlana Gasparovic
    Brekke, Mette
    Buczkowski, Krzysztof
    Buono, Nicola
    Cifcili, Saliha Serap
    Dinant, Geert-Jan
    Doorn, Babette
    Hoffman, Robert D.
    Kuodza, George
    Murchie, Peter
    Pilv, Liina
    Puia, Aida
    Rapalavicius, Aurimas
    Smyrnakis, Emmanouil
    Weltermann, Birgitta
    Harris, Michael
    BJGP OPEN, 2023, 7 (04)
  • [45] Why physicians ought not to perform virginity tests
    Behrens, Kevin Gary
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2015, 41 (08) : 691 - 695
  • [46] What Do Academic Physicians Think of Tai Chi? A Qualitative Study
    Huston, Patricia
    MacGuigan, Deirdre
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2021, 27 (05) : 434 - 441
  • [47] More preoperative assessment by physicians and less by laboratory tests
    Roizen, MF
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (03): : 204 - 205
  • [48] Impact of new guidelines on physicians' ordering of preoperative tests
    Mancuso, CA
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 14 (03) : 166 - 172
  • [49] Impact of new guidelines on physicians’ ordering of preoperative tests
    Carol A. Mancuso
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1999, 14 : 166 - 172
  • [50] WHY DO FAMILY PHYSICIANS HESITATE TO REFER TO DO SPECIALISTS
    KOTOSKE, DE
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 1985, 85 (10): : 618 - 619