Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients

被引:32
|
作者
Pitiriga, Vassiliki [1 ]
Bakalis, John [2 ]
Theodoridou, Kalliopi [1 ]
Kanellopoulos, Petros [2 ]
Saroglou, George [2 ]
Tsakris, Athanasios [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Med Sch, Dept Microbiol, 75 Mikras Asias St, Athens 11527, Greece
[2] Metropolitan Hosp, Dept Internal Med, 9 Ethnarchou Makariou St, Athens 18547, Greece
关键词
Catheterization; Central venous catheter; Sepsis; Colonization; Bloodstream infection; Insertion site; Central line-associated bloodstream infection; Peripherally inserted central catheter; CARE-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS; PREVENTION; PLACEMENT; MORTALITY; IMPACT; COSTS;
D O I
10.1186/s13756-022-01180-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) serve as an alternative to short-term central venous catheters (CVCs) for providing intravenous access in hospitalized patients. Although a number of studies suggest that PICCs are associated with a lower risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) than CVCs, recent data concerning specific patient groups support the contrary. In this regard, we are comparing CVC- and PICC-related CLABSI rates developed in a selected group of critically ill inpatients and evaluating the CLABSI microbiological distribution. Methods The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Greece between May 2017 and May 2019. We performed a two-year retrospective analysis of the data collected from medical records of consecutive adult patients who underwent PICC or CVC placement. Results A total of 1187 CVCs placed for 9774 catheter-days and 639 PICCs placed for 11,110 catheter-days, were reported and analyzed during the study period. Among CVCs, a total of 59 (4.9%) CLABSIs were identified, while among PICCs, 18 (2.8%) cases presented CLABSI (p = 0.029). The CLABSI incidence rate per 1,000 catheter-days was 6.03 for CVC group and 1.62 for PICC group (p < 0.001). The CLABSI rate due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) among the two groups was 3.17 in CVC group and 0.36 in PICC group (p < 0.001). Within CLABSI-CVC group, the most common microorganism detected was MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (27.1%) followed by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (22%). In CLABSI-PICC group, the predominant microorganism was Candida spp. (33.3%) followed by non-MDR gram-negative pathogens (22.2%). Conclusions PICC lines were associated with significantly lower CLABSI rates comparing to CVC although they were in place longer than CVC lines. Given their longer time to the development of infection, PICCs may be a safer alternative for prolonged inpatient IV access. The high prevalence of CLABSI-MDROs depicts the local microbial ecology, emphasizing the need of public health awareness.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sutureless securement of central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters with a novel securement system
    K Gregerson
    L Rutledge
    P Parks
    Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 4 (Suppl 1)
  • [32] Peripherally inserted central catheters are equivalent to centrally inserted catheters in intensive care unit patients for central venous pressure monitoring
    Latham, Heath E.
    Rawson, Scott T.
    Dwyer, Timothy T.
    Patel, Chirag C.
    Wick, Jo A.
    Simpson, Steven Q.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2012, 26 (02) : 85 - 90
  • [33] Peripherally inserted central catheters are equivalent to centrally inserted catheters in intensive care unit patients for central venous pressure monitoring
    Heath E. Latham
    Scott T. Rawson
    Timothy T. Dwyer
    Chirag C. Patel
    Jo A. Wick
    Steven Q. Simpson
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2012, 26 : 85 - 90
  • [34] The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients
    Jones, Daniel
    Wismayer, Kurt
    Bozas, George
    Palmer, June
    Elliott, Mandi
    Maraveyas, Anthony
    THROMBOSIS JOURNAL, 2017, 15
  • [35] Infection Rate of Hickman Catheters Versus Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in Oncology Patients
    Wong, W. Y.
    Chan, W. C. S.
    Ip, S. K.
    Ng, W. K.
    Chan, C. X.
    Ho, H. M.
    Siu, K. L.
    Tan, C. B.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 18 (03): : 197 - 204
  • [36] Clinical and economic burden of bloodstream infections in critical care patients with central venous catheters
    Brunelli, Steven M.
    Turenne, Wendy
    Sibbel, Scott
    Hunt, Abigail
    Pfaffle, Antony
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 35 : 69 - 74
  • [37] Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Versus Central Venous Catheters for in-Hospital Parenteral Nutrition
    Comas, Merce
    Domingo, Laia
    Jansana, Anna
    Lafuente, Elisabeth
    Civit, Anna
    Garcia-Perez, Lidia
    Lasso de la Vega, Carmen
    Cots, Francesc
    Sala, Maria
    Castells, Xavier
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2022, 18 (07) : E1109 - E1115
  • [38] The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with midline catheters compared with peripherally inserted central catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lu, Huapeng
    Yang, Qinling
    Yang, Lili
    Qu, Kai
    Tian, Boyan
    Xiao, Qigui
    Xin, Xia
    Lv, Yi
    Zheng, Xuemei
    NURSING OPEN, 2022, 9 (03): : 1873 - 1882
  • [39] Complications of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Paras-Bravo, Paula
    Paz-Zulueta, Maria
    Sarabia-Lavin, Raquel
    Jose Amo-Setien, Francisco
    Herrero-Montes, Manuel
    Olavarria-Beivide, Encarnacion
    Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Mercedes
    Torres-Manrique, Blanca
    Rodriguez-de la Vega, Carlos
    Caso-Alvarez, Vanesa
    Gonzalez-Parralo, Laura
    Manuel Antolin-Juarez, Francisco
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [40] A vancomycin-heparin lock solution for prevention of nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill neonates with peripherally inserted central venous catheters: A prospective, randomized trial
    Garland, JS
    Alex, CP
    Henrickson, KJ
    McAuliffe, TL
    Maki, DG
    PEDIATRICS, 2005, 116 (02) : E198 - E205