Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients

被引:32
|
作者
Pitiriga, Vassiliki [1 ]
Bakalis, John [2 ]
Theodoridou, Kalliopi [1 ]
Kanellopoulos, Petros [2 ]
Saroglou, George [2 ]
Tsakris, Athanasios [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Med Sch, Dept Microbiol, 75 Mikras Asias St, Athens 11527, Greece
[2] Metropolitan Hosp, Dept Internal Med, 9 Ethnarchou Makariou St, Athens 18547, Greece
关键词
Catheterization; Central venous catheter; Sepsis; Colonization; Bloodstream infection; Insertion site; Central line-associated bloodstream infection; Peripherally inserted central catheter; CARE-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS; PREVENTION; PLACEMENT; MORTALITY; IMPACT; COSTS;
D O I
10.1186/s13756-022-01180-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) serve as an alternative to short-term central venous catheters (CVCs) for providing intravenous access in hospitalized patients. Although a number of studies suggest that PICCs are associated with a lower risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) than CVCs, recent data concerning specific patient groups support the contrary. In this regard, we are comparing CVC- and PICC-related CLABSI rates developed in a selected group of critically ill inpatients and evaluating the CLABSI microbiological distribution. Methods The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Greece between May 2017 and May 2019. We performed a two-year retrospective analysis of the data collected from medical records of consecutive adult patients who underwent PICC or CVC placement. Results A total of 1187 CVCs placed for 9774 catheter-days and 639 PICCs placed for 11,110 catheter-days, were reported and analyzed during the study period. Among CVCs, a total of 59 (4.9%) CLABSIs were identified, while among PICCs, 18 (2.8%) cases presented CLABSI (p = 0.029). The CLABSI incidence rate per 1,000 catheter-days was 6.03 for CVC group and 1.62 for PICC group (p < 0.001). The CLABSI rate due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) among the two groups was 3.17 in CVC group and 0.36 in PICC group (p < 0.001). Within CLABSI-CVC group, the most common microorganism detected was MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (27.1%) followed by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (22%). In CLABSI-PICC group, the predominant microorganism was Candida spp. (33.3%) followed by non-MDR gram-negative pathogens (22.2%). Conclusions PICC lines were associated with significantly lower CLABSI rates comparing to CVC although they were in place longer than CVC lines. Given their longer time to the development of infection, PICCs may be a safer alternative for prolonged inpatient IV access. The high prevalence of CLABSI-MDROs depicts the local microbial ecology, emphasizing the need of public health awareness.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients
    Vassiliki Pitiriga
    John Bakalis
    Kalliopi Theodoridou
    Petros Kanellopoulos
    George Saroglou
    Athanasios Tsakris
    Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 11
  • [2] Peripherally inserted central venous catheters in critically ill premature neonates
    Ozkiraz, Servet
    Gokmen, Zeynel
    Ince, Deniz Anuk
    Akcan, Abdullah Baris
    Kilicdag, Hasan
    Ozel, Deniz
    Ecevit, Ayse
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2013, 14 (04): : 320 - 324
  • [3] Peripherally inserted central catheters are associated with lower risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters in paediatric intensive care patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis
    Yamaguchi, Ricardo Silveira
    Noritomi, Danilo Teixeira
    Degaspare, Natalia Viu
    Cisternas Munoz, Gabriela Ortega
    Matos Porto, Ana Paula
    Costa, Silvia Figueiredo
    Ranzani, Otavio T.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 43 (08) : 1097 - 1104
  • [4] Peripherally inserted central catheters are associated with lower risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters in paediatric intensive care patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis
    Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi
    Danilo Teixeira Noritomi
    Natalia Viu Degaspare
    Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz
    Ana Paula Matos Porto
    Silvia Figueiredo Costa
    Otavio T. Ranzani
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2017, 43 : 1097 - 1104
  • [5] The safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in critically ill patients: A retrospective observational study
    Maezawa, Toshinori
    Sakuraya, Masaaki
    Yoshida, Kenichi
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2024, 25 (05): : 1479 - 1485
  • [6] PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS
    RYDER, MA
    NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1993, 28 (04) : 937 - 971
  • [7] The Risk of Bloodstream Infection Associated with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Compared with Central Venous Catheters in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chopra, Vineet
    O'Horo, John C.
    Rogers, Mary A. M.
    Maki, Dennis G.
    Safdar, Nasia
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (09): : 908 - 918
  • [8] Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters and Central Venous Catheters in Burn Patients: A Comparative Review
    Fearonce, Griffin
    Faraklas, Iris
    Saffle, Jeffrey R.
    Cochran, Amalia
    JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2010, 31 (01): : 31 - 35
  • [9] Increased Risk of Thrombosis Associated with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Compared with Conventional Central Venous Catheters in Children with Leukemia
    Charny, Pierre-Amael Noailly
    Bleyzac, Nathalie
    Ohannessian, Robin
    Aubert, Edouard
    Bertrand, Yves
    Renard, Cecile
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2018, 198 : 46 - 52
  • [10] Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
    Lobo, Bob L.
    Vaidean, Georgeta
    Broyles, Joyce
    Reaves, Anne B.
    Shorr, Ronald I.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2009, 4 (07) : 417 - 422