Predictive factors for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in women with ductal carcinoma in situ

被引:21
作者
Bayraktar, Soley [2 ]
Elsayegh, Nisreen [1 ]
Barrera, Angelica M. Gutierrez [1 ]
Lin, Heather [3 ]
Kuerer, Henry [4 ]
Tasbas, Tunc
Muse, Kimberly I. [1 ]
Ready, Kaylene [1 ]
Litton, Jennifer [1 ]
Meric-Bernstam, Funda [4 ]
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. [1 ]
Albarracin, Constance T. [5 ]
Arun, Banu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Canc Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
ductal carcinoma in situ; BRCA; 1; 2; mutations; BRCAPRO; family history; predictive factors; BRCA2; MUTATIONS; BREAST-CANCER; OVARIAN-CANCER; HIGH PREVALENCE; CARRIERS; LESIONS; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.26428
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), like their counterparts with invasive breast cancer, warrant genetic risk assessment and testing on the basis of high-risk variables. The authors of this report identified predictive factors for mutations in the breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 in women who were diagnosed with DCIS. METHODS: One hundred eighteen women with DCIS who were referred for genetic counseling and underwent genetic testing for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations between 2003 and 2010 were included in the study. Logistic regression models were fit to determine the associations between potential predictive factors and BRCA status. RESULTS: Of 118 high-risk women with DCIS, 27% (n 32) tested positive for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Of those, 10% (n 12) and 17% (n 20) had BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, respectively. Age, race, and tumor characteristics did not differ between BRCA noncarriers and carriers. In a multivariate logistic model, 2 relatives with ovarian cancer (OC) (odds ratio [OR], 8.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-56.29; P.034), and a score >= 10% according to the BRCAPRO mathematical model for calculating the probability that a particular family member carries a germline BRCA mutation (OR, 6.37; 95% CI, 2.23-18.22; P.0005) remained as independent significant predictors for a BRCA mutation. Fifty-seven percent of mutation carriers but only 25% of noncarriers underwent prophylactic mastectomy(P.0037). This difference remained significant for patients aged <= 40 years (P.025). CONCLUSIONS: Women who had DCIS and a family history of OC or who had BRCAPRO scores >= 10% had a high rate of BRCA positivity regardless of age at diagnosis. These findings suggest that high-risk patients with DCIS are appropriate candidates for genetic testing for BRCA mutations in the presence of predictive factors even if they do not have invasive breast cancer. Cancer 2012; 118: 1515-22. VC 2011 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1515 / 1522
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Pathologic characteristics of breast parenchyma in patients with hereditary breast carcinoma, including BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers [J].
Adem, C ;
Reynolds, C ;
Soderberg, CL ;
Slezak, JM ;
McDonnell, SK ;
Sebo, TJ ;
Schaid, DJ ;
Myers, JL ;
Sellers, TA ;
Hartmann, LC ;
Jenkins, RB .
CANCER, 2003, 97 (01) :1-11
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, STAT METHODS
[3]   High Prevalence of Preinvasive Lesions Adjacent to BRCA1/2-Associated Breast Cancers [J].
Arun, Banu ;
Vogel, Kristen J. ;
Lopez, Adriana ;
Hernandez, Mike ;
Atchley, Deann ;
Broglio, Kristine R. ;
Amos, Christopher I. ;
Meric-Bernstam, Funda ;
Kuerer, Henry ;
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. ;
Albarracin, Constance T. .
CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2009, 2 (02) :122-127
[4]   Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a large United States sample [J].
Chen, SN ;
Iversen, ES ;
Friebel, T ;
Finkelstein, D ;
Weber, BL ;
Eisen, A ;
Peterson, LE ;
Schildkraut, JM ;
Isaacs, C ;
Peshkin, BN ;
Corio, C ;
Leondaridis, L ;
Tomlinson, G ;
Dutsm, D ;
Kerber, R ;
Amos, CI ;
Strong, LC ;
Berry, DA ;
Euthus, DM ;
Parmigiani, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (06) :863-871
[5]   Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ [J].
Claus, EB ;
Petruzella, S ;
Matloff, E ;
Carter, D .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (08) :964-969
[6]   The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast:: a review [J].
Erbas, B ;
Provenzan, E ;
Armes, J ;
Gertig, D .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2006, 97 (02) :135-144
[7]   Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the computer model BRCAPRO [J].
Euhus, DM ;
Smith, KC ;
Robinson, L ;
Stucky, A ;
Olopade, OI ;
Cummings, S ;
Garber, JE ;
Chittenden, A ;
Mills, GB ;
Rieger, P ;
Esserman, L ;
Crawford, B ;
Hughes, KS ;
Roche, CA ;
Ganz, PA ;
Seldon, J ;
Fabian, CJ ;
Klemp, J ;
Tomlinson, G .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2002, 94 (11) :844-851
[8]   Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families [J].
Ford, D ;
Easton, DF ;
Stratton, M ;
Narod, S ;
Goldgar, D ;
Devilee, P ;
Bishop, DT ;
Weber, B ;
Lenoir, G ;
Chang-Claude, J ;
Sobol, H ;
Teare, MD ;
Struewing, J ;
Arason, A ;
Scherneck, S ;
Peto, J ;
Rebbeck, TR ;
Tonin, P ;
Neuhausen, S ;
Barkardottir, R ;
Eyfjord, J ;
Lynch, H ;
Ponder, BAJ ;
Gayther, SA ;
Birch, JM ;
Lindblom, A ;
Stoppa-Lyonnet, D ;
Bignon, Y ;
Borg, A ;
Hamann, U ;
Haites, N ;
Scott, RJ ;
Maugard, CM ;
Vasen, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1998, 62 (03) :676-689
[9]   Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2:: Analysis of 10,000 individuals [J].
Frank, TS ;
Deffenbaugh, AM ;
Reid, JE ;
Hulick, M ;
Ward, BE ;
Lingenfelter, B ;
Gumpper, KL ;
Scholl, T ;
Tavtigian, SV ;
Pruss, DR ;
Critchfield, GC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (06) :1480-1490
[10]   Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Women with Breast Carcinoma In Situ and Referred for Genetic Testing [J].
Hall, Michael J. ;
Reid, Julia E. ;
Wenstrup, Richard J. .
CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2010, 3 (12) :1579-1585