Comparison of the Idaho Technology FilmArray System to Real-Time PCR for Detection of Respiratory Pathogens in Children

被引:99
|
作者
Pierce, Virginia M. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Elkan, Michael [1 ,4 ]
Leet, Marilyn [3 ,4 ]
McGowan, Karin L. [3 ,4 ]
Hodinka, Richard L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Clin Virol Lab, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Pediat, Div Infect Dis, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Clin Microbiol Lab, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
RAPID DIAGNOSIS; VIRUS-INFECTIONS; MULTIPLEX PCR; TRACT INFECTIONS; INFLUENZA; ASSAY; MANAGEMENT; ADULTS; SPECIMENS; EMERGENCY;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.05996-11
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The FilmArray Respiratory Panel (RP) multiplexed nucleic acid amplification test (Idaho Technology, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) was compared to laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays for the detection of various respiratory viruses and certain bacterial pathogens. A total of 215 frozen archived pediatric respiratory specimens previously characterized as either negative or positive for one or more pathogens by real-time PCR were examined using the FilmArray RP system. Overall agreement between the FilmArray RP and corresponding real-time PCR assays for shared analytes was 98.6% (kappa = 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89 to 0.94]). The combined positive percent agreement was 89.4% (95% CI, 85.4 to 92.6); the negative percent agreement was 99.6% (95% CI, 99.2 to 99.8). The mean real-time PCR threshold cycle (C-T) value for specimens with discordant results was 36.46 +/- 4.54. Detection of coinfections and correct identification of influenza A virus subtypes were comparable to those of real-time PCR when using the FilmArray RP. The greatest comparative difference in sensitivity was observed for adenovirus; only 11 of 24 (45.8%; 95% CI, 27.9 to 64.9) clinical specimens positive for adenovirus by real-time PCR were also positive by the FilmArray RP. In addition, upon testing 20 characterized adenovirus serotypes prepared at high and low viral loads, the FilmArray RP did not detect serotypes 6 and 41 at either level and failed to detect serotypes 2, 20, 35, and 37 when viral loads were low. The FilmArray RP system is rapid and extremely user-friendly, with results available in just over 1 h with almost no labor involved. Its low throughput is a significant drawback for laboratories receiving large numbers of specimens, as only a single sample can be processed at a time with one instrument.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 371
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the FilmArray Respiratory Panel and Prodesse Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection of Respiratory Pathogens
    Loeffelholz, M. J.
    Pong, D. L.
    Pyles, R. B.
    Xiong, Y.
    Miller, A. L.
    Bufton, K. K.
    Chonmaitree, T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 49 (12) : 4083 - 4088
  • [2] Comparison of the FilmArray assay and in-house real-time PCR for detection of respiratory infection
    Andersson, Maria E.
    Olofsson, Sigvard
    Lindh, Magnus
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 46 (12) : 897 - 901
  • [3] Detection of respiratory pathogens by real-time PCR in children with clinical suspicion of pertussis
    van Kruijssen, Alida M.
    Templeton, Kate E.
    van der Plas, Roos N.
    van Doorn, H. Rogier
    Claas, Eric C. J.
    Sukhai, Ram N.
    Kuijper, Ed J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2007, 166 (11) : 1189 - 1191
  • [4] Detection of respiratory pathogens by real-time PCR in children with clinical suspicion of pertussis
    Alida M. van Kruijssen
    Kate E. Templeton
    Roos N. van der Plas
    H. Rogier van Doorn
    Eric C. J. Claas
    Ram N. Sukhai
    Ed J. Kuijper
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2007, 166 : 1189 - 1191
  • [5] Comparison of respiratory and Meningitis/Encephalitis viruses detected by FilmArray® multiplex PCR versus real-time PCR
    Koller, Roger
    Barbani, M. T.
    Luthi, A. U.
    Zurcher, S.
    Steinlin-Schopfer, J. F.
    Leib, S. L.
    Gorgievski-Hrisoho, M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2016, 82 : S39 - S39
  • [6] Detection of respiratory pathogens with the RespiFast RG Panel, in comparison with an in-house real-time PCR assay
    Adams, O.
    Henrich, B.
    Wall, G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2015, 70 : S51 - S51
  • [7] Detection of Strawberry Pathogens by Real-Time PCR
    Cubero, J.
    Ayllon, M. A.
    Gell, I.
    Melgarejo, P.
    De Cal, A.
    Martin-Sanchez, P. M.
    Perez-Jimenez, R. M.
    Soria, C.
    Segundo, E.
    Larena, I.
    VI INTERNATIONAL STRAWBERRY SYMPOSIUM, 2009, 842 : 263 - 266
  • [8] Real-time PCR for detection of respiratory viral pathogens in pediatric BMT patients
    Bredius, RGM
    Templeton, KE
    Scheltinga, SA
    Kroes, ACM
    Vossen, JM
    Claas, ECJ
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 31 : S95 - S95
  • [9] Successful nanolitre real-time PCR detection of respiratory pathogens in clinical specimens
    Slinger, R.
    Moldovan, I.
    Barrowman, N.
    Chan, F.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2012, 18 (08) : E286 - E288
  • [10] Comparison of ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel with Laboratory-Developed Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection of Respiratory Pathogens
    Nijhuis, R. H. T.
    Guerendiain, D.
    Claas, E. C. J.
    Templeton, K. E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 55 (06) : 1938 - 1945