Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast invasive lobular carcinoma: comparison with invasive carcinoma of no special type using a histogram analysis

被引:6
作者
Jeong, Seongkyun [1 ]
Kim, Tae Hee [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sangmyung Univ, Dept Human Intelligence Robot Engn, Cheonan, South Korea
[2] Ajou Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Worldcup Ro 164, Suwon 16499, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[3] Grad Sch Med, Suwon, South Korea
关键词
Diffusion-weighed imaging (DWI); invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC); apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); prognostic; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CANCER; COEFFICIENT; MRI; CONTRAST; DWI; DIFFERENTIATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.21037/qims-21-355
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: To investigate the imaging findings and visibility of breast invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and compare quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics of ILC and invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) using a histogram analysis. Methods: We performed an observational retrospective study of 629 consecutive women with pathologically proven ILC and invasive ductal carcinoma of NST, who underwent 3-T MRI including DWI, between January 2017 and August 2020. Results: After propensity score matching, 71 women were allocated to each group. On DWI, 9 (12.7%) lesions of ILC and 4 (5.6%) invasive carcinomas of the NST were not visualized. For the tumor visibility on DWI, tumor size, tumor ADC value, and background diffusion grade were significantly associated with the visibility score in both groups (all P<0.05), whereas the mean background ADC value was not significant (P>0.05). The mean ADC (1.226x10(-3) vs. 1.051x10(-3) mm(2)/s, P<0.001), median ADC (1.222x10(-3) vs. 1.051x10(-3) mm(2)/s, P=0.002), maximum ADC (1.758x10(-3) vs. 1.504x10(-3) mm(2)/s, P<0.001), minimum ADC (0.717x10(-3) vs. 0.649x10(-3) mm(2)/s, P=0.003), 90th percentile ADC (1.506x10(-3) vs. 1.292x10(-3) mm(2)/s, P<0.001) and 10th percentile ADC (0.956x10(-3) vs. 0.818x10(-3) mm(2)/s, P=0.008) were higher in ILC than in invasive carcinoma of NST. Additionally, the ADC difference value of the TLC was higher than that of invasive carcinoma of NST (1.04x10(-3) vs. 0.855x10(-3) mm(2)/s, P=0.027). Conclusions: On DWI, the visibility of ILC was lower compared to invasive carcinoma of NST. ILC showed higher quantitative ADC values and higher ADC difference values.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 105
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs. Whole Tumor Regions of Interest
    Arponent, Otso
    Sudah, Mazen
    Masarwah, Amro
    Taina, Mikko
    Rautiainen, Suvi
    Kononen, Mervi
    Sironen, Reijo
    Kosma, Veli-Matti
    Sutela, Anna
    Hakumaki, Juhana
    Vanninen, Ritva
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10):
  • [2] Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast-a consensus and mission statement from the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group
    Baltzer, Pascal
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Iima, Mami
    Sigmund, Eric E.
    Clauser, Paola
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    Martincich, Laura
    Partridge, Savannah C.
    Patterson, Andrew
    Pinker, Katja
    Thibault, Fabienne
    Camps-Herrero, Julia
    Le Bihan, Denis
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (03) : 1436 - 1450
  • [3] Potential of Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Characterization of Breast Lesions Intraindividual Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Bickel, Hubert
    Spick, Claudio
    Wengert, Georg
    Woitek, Ramona
    Kapetas, Panagiotis
    Clauser, Paola
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Pinker, Katja
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2018, 53 (04) : 229 - 235
  • [4] Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer
    Berg, WA
    Gutierrez, L
    NessAiver, MS
    Carter, WB
    Bhargavan, M
    Lewis, RS
    Ioffe, OB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) : 830 - 849
  • [5] Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values
    Bickel, Hubert
    Pinker, Katja
    Polanec, Stephan
    Magometschnigg, Heinrich
    Wengert, Georg
    Spick, Claudio
    Bogner, Wolfgang
    Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Baltzer, Pascal
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (05) : 1883 - 1892
  • [6] Bickel H, 2015, INVEST RADIOL, V50, P95, DOI 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000104
  • [7] Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dorrius, Monique D.
    Dijkstra, Hildebrand
    Oudkerk, Matthijs
    Sijens, Paul E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (11) : 2835 - 2847
  • [8] Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging
    Guo, Y
    Cai, YQ
    Cai, ZL
    Gao, YG
    An, NY
    Ma, L
    Mahankali, S
    Gao, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 16 (02) : 172 - 178
  • [9] Analysis of factors influencing the degree of detectability on diffusion-weighted MRI and diffusion background signals in patients with invasive breast cancer
    Hahn, Soo Yeon
    Ko, Eun Sook
    Han, Boo-Kyung
    Lim, Yaeji
    Gu, Seonhye
    Ko, Eun Young
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (27)
  • [10] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Breast Masses: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance Using Various Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Parameters
    Hirano, Maki
    Satake, Hiroko
    Ishigaki, Satoko
    Ikeda, Mitsuru
    Kawai, Hisashi
    Naganawa, Shinji
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (03) : 717 - 722