Venous thromboembolism after major venous injuries: Competing priorities

被引:22
作者
Frank, Brian [1 ]
Maher, Zoe [2 ]
Hazelton, Joshua P. [4 ]
Resnick, Shelby [5 ]
Dauer, Elizabeth [3 ]
Goldenberg, Anna [4 ]
Lubitz, Andrea L. [3 ]
Smith, Brian P. [5 ]
Saillant, Noelle N. [6 ]
Reilly, Patrick M. [5 ]
Seamon, Mark J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Geisinger Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Danville, PA USA
[2] Temple Univ, Sch Med, Div Trauma & Surg Crit Care, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Temple Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Rowan Univ, Cooper Med Sch, Dept Surg, Div Trauma & Surg Crit Care, Camden, NJ USA
[5] Univ Penn, Div Traumatol Surg Crit Care & Emergency Surg, Perelman Sch Med, 1st Floor Suite 120,Med Off Bldg,51 North 39th St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Vascular injury; venous injury; anticoagulation; venous thromboembolism; CIVILIAN VASCULAR TRAUMA; DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS; REPAIR; MANAGEMENT; RISK; COMPLICATIONS; PROPHYLAXIS; LIGATION; THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS; FASCIOTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000001655
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) after major vascular injury (MVI) is particularly challenging because the competing risk of thrombosis and embolization after direct vessel injury must be balanced with risk of bleeding after surgical repair. We hypothesized that venous injuries, repair type, and intraoperative anticoagulation would influence VTE formation after MVI. METHODS A multi-institution, retrospective cohort study of consecutive MVI patients was conducted at three urban, Level I centers (2005-2013). Patients with MVI of the neck, torso, or proximal extremities (to elbows/knees) were included. Our primary study endpoint was the development of VTE (DVT or pulmonary embolism [PE]). RESULTS The 435 major vascular injury patients were primarily young (27 years) men (89%) with penetrating (84%) injuries. When patients with (n = 108) and without (n = 327) VTE were compared, we observed no difference in age, mechanism, extremity injury, tourniquet use, orthopedic and spine injuries, damage control, local heparinized saline, or vascular surgery consultation (all p > 0.05). VTE patients had greater Injury Severity Score (ISS) (17 vs. 12), shock indices (1 vs. 0.9), and more torso (58% vs. 35%) and venous (73% vs. 48%) injuries, but less often received systemic intraoperative anticoagulation (39% vs. 53%) or postoperative enoxaparin (47% vs. 61%) prophylaxis (all p < 0.05). After controlling for ISS, hemodynamics, injured vessel, intraoperative anticoagulation, and postoperative prophylaxis, multivariable analysis revealed venous injury was independently predictive of VTE (odds ratio, 2.7; p = 0.002). Multivariable analysis of the venous injuries subset (n = 237) then determined that only delay in starting VTE chemoprophylaxis (odds ratio, 1.3/day; p = 0.013) independently predicted VTE after controlling for ISS, hemodynamics, injured vessel, surgical subspecialty, intraoperative anticoagulation, and postoperative prophylaxis. Overall, 3.4% of venous injury patients developed PE, but PE rates were not related to their operative management (p = 0.72). CONCLUSION Patients with major venous injuries are at high risk for VTE, regardless of intraoperative management. Our results support the immediate initiation of postoperative chemoprophylaxis in patients with major venous injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management, level IV.
引用
收藏
页码:1095 / 1101
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] EXPERIENCE WITH 115 CIVILIAN VENOUS INJURIES
    AGARWAL, N
    SHAH, PM
    CLAUSS, RH
    REYNOLDS, BM
    STAHL, WM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1982, 22 (10) : 827 - 832
  • [2] Allen CJ, 2015, AM SURGEON, V81, P663
  • [3] Risk of pulmonary embolism with repair or ligation of major venous injury following penetrating trauma
    Allen, Casey J.
    Hsu, Albert
    Murray, Clark R.
    Meizoso, Jonathan P.
    Ray, Juliet J.
    Schulman, Carl I.
    Livingstone, Alan S.
    Lineen, Edward B.
    Ginzburg, Enrique
    Namias, Nicholas
    Proctor, Kenneth G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2015, 78 (03) : 580 - 585
  • [4] Bagg M, 2008, J TRAUMA, V64, pS161
  • [5] An Economic Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Strategies in Critically III Trauma Patients at Risk of Bleeding
    Chiasson, T. Carter
    Manns, Braden J.
    Stelfox, Henry Thomas
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2009, 6 (06)
  • [6] PREVENTION OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM
    CLAGETT, GP
    ANDERSON, FA
    HEIT, J
    LEVINE, MN
    WHEELER, HB
    [J]. CHEST, 1995, 108 (04) : S312 - S334
  • [7] A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM AFTER MAJOR TRAUMA
    GEERTS, WH
    CODE, KI
    JAY, RM
    CHEN, EL
    SZALAI, JP
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (24) : 1601 - 1606
  • [8] Timing of initial administration of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis in patients following elective hip arthroplasty -: A systematic review
    Hull, RD
    Pineo, GF
    Stein, PD
    Mah, AF
    MacIsaac, SM
    Dahl, OE
    Ghali, WA
    Butcher, MS
    Brant, RF
    Bergqvist, D
    Hamulyák, K
    Francis, CW
    Marder, VJ
    Raskob, GE
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (16) : 1952 - +
  • [9] VENOUS INJURIES - MILITARY VERSUS CIVILIAN EXPERIENCE
    IERARDI, RP
    KERSTEIN, MD
    [J]. MILITARY MEDICINE, 1995, 160 (08) : 396 - 398
  • [10] A survey of thromboprophylaxis management in patients with major trauma
    Imberti, Davide
    Ageno, Walter
    [J]. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF HAEMOSTASIS AND THROMBOSIS, 2005, 34 (06) : 249 - 254