CLASSICAL NATURAL LAW, MODERN NATURAL LAW AND POSITIVISM

被引：0

作者：

Megias Quiros, Jose Justo ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Cadiz, Dept Derecho Publ, Catedratico Filosofia Derecho, Cadiz, Spain

来源：

QUAESTIO IURIS | 2021年 / 14卷 / 04期

关键词：

Natural Law; Reality; Reason; Consensus; Positivism;

D O I：

10.12957/rqi.2021.12255

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

For centuries, the jurist was able to discover from the natural reality that allowed legal requirements to declare what was right or wrong. Modernity chose to abandon reality as a starting point and go from abstract reason and consensus to determine what should be had for just universally. Contemporary positivism has chosen to reduce any possible justice to the content of the law's consensus within society. Would it be possible to return to the path of right reason to discover the just thing examining the human reality?

引用

页码：1881 / 1909

页数：29

共 37 条

[1]

APARISI MIRALLES A., 2007, Derecho a la paz y derecho a la guerra en Francisco de Vitoria

[2]

AQUINO SANTO TOMAS DE, 1947, SUMA TEOLOGICA

[3]

ARPINTERO F., 1977, IUS COMMUNE, P108

[4]

CARPINTERO BENÍTEZ FRANCISCO, 2003, Rev. estud. hist.-juríd., P341

[5]

CARPINTERO F., 2012, DERECHO JUSTICIA IMP

[6]

Carpintero Francisco., 2008, La ley natural: historia de un concepto controvertido

[7]

CARPINTERO FranciscoBENITEZ., 2000, Historia breve del derecho natural

[8]

CHAVEZ -FERNANDEZ J., 2011, DIKAION, P49

[9]

CORREA M., 1980, REV CHIL DERECH-PUCC, V7, P502

[10]

DEL POZO J.M., 1993, CICERON CONOCIMIENTO

← 1 2 3 4 →