Focusing biodiversity research on the needs of decision makers

被引:10
|
作者
Smythe, KD [1 ]
Bernabo, JC [1 ]
Carter, TB [1 ]
Jutro, PR [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, WASHINGTON, DC 20460 USA
关键词
biodiversity; ecosystem management; ecological stewardship; sustainable development; assessment;
D O I
10.1007/BF01205966
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The project on Biodiversity Uncertainties and Research Needs (BURN) ensures the advancement of usable knowledge on biodiversity by obtaining input from decision makers on their priority information needs about biodiversity and then using this input to engage leading scientists in designing policy-relevant research. Decision makers articulated concerns related to four issues: significance of biodiversity; status and trends of biodiversity; management for biodiversity; and the linkage of social, cultural, economic, legal, and biological objectives. Leading natural and social scientists then identified the research required to address the decision makers' needs and determined the probability of success. The diverse group of experts reached consensus on several fundamental issues, helping to clarify the role of biodiversity in land and resource management. The BURN participants identified several features that should be incorporated into policy-relevant research plans and management strategies for biodiversity. Research and assessment efforts should be: multidisciplinary and integrative, participatory with stakeholder involvement, hierarchical (multiple scales), and problem- and region-specific. The activities should be focused regionally within a global perspective. Meta-analysis of existing data is needed on ail fronts to assess the slate of the science. More specifically, the scientists recommended six priority research areas that should be pursued to address the information needs articulated by decision makers: (1) characterization of biodiversity, (2) environmental valuation, (3) management for sustainability-for humans and the environment (adaptive management), (4) information management strategies, (5) governance and stewardship issues, and (6) communication and outreach. Broad recommendations were developed for each research area to provide direction for research planning and resource management strategies. The results wilt directly benefit those groups that require biodiversity research to address their needs-whether to develop policy, manage natural resources, or make other decisions affecting biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 872
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Surrogate decision makers’ attitudes towards research decision making for critically ill patients
    Kali A. Barrett
    Niall D. Ferguson
    Valerie Athaide
    Deborah J. Cook
    Jan O. Friedrich
    Ellen McDonald
    Ruxandra Pinto
    Orla M. Smith
    James Stevenson
    Damon C. Scales
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2012, 38 : 1616 - 1623
  • [42] Spatial priorities for biodiversity and ecosystem services considering theoretical decision-makers' attitudes to risk
    Wang, Lijuan
    Zheng, Hua
    Polasky, Stephen
    Long, Yanxu
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 3 (11):
  • [43] Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: Patterns, mechanisms, and research needs
    Hansen, AJ
    Knight, RL
    Marzluff, JM
    Powell, S
    Brown, K
    Gude, PH
    Jones, A
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2005, 15 (06) : 1893 - 1905
  • [44] Mining and biodiversity: key issues and research needs in conservation science
    Sonter, Laura J.
    Ali, Saleem H.
    Watson, James E. M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 285 (1892)
  • [45] Achieving biodiversity benefits with offsets: Research gaps, challenges, and needs
    Gelcich, Stefan
    Vargas, Camila
    Carreras, Maria Jose
    Castilla, Juan Carlos
    Donlan, C. Josh
    AMBIO, 2017, 46 (02) : 184 - 189
  • [46] Achieving biodiversity benefits with offsets: Research gaps, challenges, and needs
    Stefan Gelcich
    Camila Vargas
    Maria Jose Carreras
    Juan Carlos Castilla
    C. Josh Donlan
    Ambio, 2017, 46 : 184 - 189
  • [47] Meeting decision makers' needs for evidence-based information on child and family policy
    Cannon, JS
    Kilburn, MR
    JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 22 (04) : 665 - 669
  • [48] THE OECD FUTURE STUDIES INFORMATION BASE - MEETING THE INFORMATION NEEDS OF DECISION-MAKERS
    ANDRIEU, M
    ONLINE & CDROM REVIEW, 1994, 18 (01): : 51 - 51
  • [49] HEALTH DECISION MAKERS PERCEPTIONS OF PROGRAM-EVALUATION - RELATIONSHIP TO PURPOSE AND INFORMATION NEEDS
    CARPINELLO, SE
    NEWMAN, DL
    JATULIS, LL
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1992, 15 (04) : 405 - 419
  • [50] Training needs of coastal resources decision makers in Ohio's Lake Erie basin
    Kellogg, WA
    Tevesz, MJS
    Robey, C
    O'Brien, K
    McGoun, M
    Toth, K
    Baracskay, D
    COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 33 (03) : 335 - 351