Mobility scooters in Italy: the reason of a "missed revolution". A potential resource for individual mobility in the Covid-19 era needs legislation

被引:2
作者
Cannata, Giuseppe [1 ]
Nigro, Marialisa [2 ]
Ljoka, Concetta [1 ]
Mure, Mihaela [1 ]
Coluccia, Guerino [3 ]
Giordani, Laura [1 ]
Crisalli, Umberto [4 ]
Foti, Calogero [1 ]
机构
[1] Tor Vergata Univ, Clin Sci & Translat Med Dept, Phys & Rehabil Med, Rome, Italy
[2] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Engn, Rome, Italy
[3] Off Ortoped Srl, Via Casale Ricci 3, I-03100 Frosinone, Italy
[4] Tor Vergata Univ, Dept Enterprise Engn Mario Lucertini, Rome, Italy
关键词
Mobility scooters; Electric wheelchairs; Electric micromobility; Urban mobility; Legislation; ACCESSIBILITY;
D O I
10.6092/1970-9870/8257
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Mobility scooters have evolved up to modem cabin versions and to application of still futuristic solutions in the automotive sector: they could even be a resource for individual mobility in the Covid-19 era, but in Italy they seem unable to establish, mainly because of lacking and approximate legislation. Article 46 of the Italian Highway Code generically delegates the definition of "machines for disabled persons" (not considered vehicles) to "current Community provisions", but the explanatory note of heading 8713 of EU Combined Nomenclature of goods and EU Regulations 718/2009 and 2021/1367 equate mobility scooters to motor vehicles: as such they are an unknown entity for the Highway Code, therefore they should be considered unregulated atypical vehicles, which are forbidden in public areas. We propose the classification of mobility scooters as "motor vehicles" for both able and disabled persons and a specific regulation of their characteristics and circulation. Our legislative proposal could be useful even outside Italy, since some disputes at the European and National Courts and the absence of mobility scooters among the three-wheel vehicles and quadricycles categorized by EU Regulation 168/2013 are a symptom that they are still a controversial topic even abroad and need a clear-cut national and international legislation.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 366
页数:29
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   MOBILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY OF THE AGEING SOCIETY DEFINING PROFILES OF THE ELDERLY POPULATION AND NEIGHBOURHOODS [J].
Akhavan, Mina ;
Vecchio, Giovanni .
TEMA-JOURNAL OF LAND USE MOBILITY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, :9-22
[2]   SMART MOBILITY AND ELDERLY PEOPLE CAN ICT MAKE THE CITY MORE ACCESSIBLE FOR EVERYBODY? [J].
Battarra, Rosaria ;
Zucaro, Floriana ;
Tremiterra, Maria Rosa .
TEMA-JOURNAL OF LAND USE MOBILITY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, :23-42
[3]   Scoping review of mobility scooter-related research studies [J].
Ben Mortenson, W. ;
Kim, Jenny .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 53 (05) :531-539
[4]   On the verge of change: Maverick innovation with mobility scooters [J].
Birtchnell, Thomas ;
Harada, Theresa ;
Waitt, Gordon .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2018, 27 :118-128
[5]  
Bricocoli M, 2018, TEMA, P3
[6]   GROWING OLD AND KEEPING MOBILE IN ITALY ACTIVE AGEING AND THE IMPORTANCE OF URBAN MOBILITY PLANNING STRATEGIES [J].
Burlando, Claudia ;
Cusano, Ines .
TEMA-JOURNAL OF LAND USE MOBILITY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, :43-52
[7]  
Cannata G., 2020, BRACES ORTHOSES PROS
[8]  
Cannata G., 2019, RIV EC POLITICA TRAS, V7
[9]  
Cannata G., 2021, FISIATRIA ITALIANA, V6, pS8
[10]  
Cappellini R.F., 2020, ALTALEX 0227