A state of the art review and categorization of multi-branched instruments for NOTES and SILS

被引:48
作者
Arkenbout, Ewout A. [1 ]
Henselmans, Paul W. J. [1 ]
Jelinek, Filip [1 ]
Breedveld, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Mech Maritime & Mat Engn, Biomech Engn Dept, Bioinspired Technol Grp, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2015年 / 29卷 / 06期
关键词
General; Instruments; Human/robotics; Technical; TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; SINGLE-SITE SURGERY; PORT LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; IN-VIVO ROBOT; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; SURGICAL ROBOT; TRANSGASTRIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; MULTITASKING PLATFORM; THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPE; PROTOTYPE ENDOSCOPE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-014-3816-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Since the advent of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), a variety of multitasking platforms have been under development with the objective to allow for bimanual surgical tasks to be performed. These instruments show large differences in construction, enabled degrees of freedom (DOF), and control aspects. Through a literature review, the absence of an in-depth analysis and structural comparison of these instruments in the literature is addressed. All the designed and prototyped multitasking platforms are identified and categorized with respect to their actively controlled DOF in their shafts and branches. Additionally, a graphical overview of patents, bench test experiments, and animal and/or human trials performed with each instrument is provided. The large range of instruments, various actuation strategies, and different direct and indirect control methods implemented in the instruments show that an optimal instrument configuration has not been found yet. Moreover, several questions remain unanswered with respect to which DOF are essential for bimanual tasks and which control methods are best suited for the control of these DOF. Considering the complexity of the currently prototyped and tested instruments, future NOTES and SILS instrument development will potentially necessitate a reduction of the available DOF to minimize the control complexity, thereby allowing for single surgeon bimanual task execution.
引用
收藏
页码:1281 / 1296
页数:16
相关论文
共 152 条
[21]  
Curcillo Paul G 2nd, 2009, Surg Technol Int, V18, P19
[22]   The ANUBIS™ project [J].
Dallemagne, Bernard ;
Marescaux, Jacques .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2010, 19 (05) :257-261
[23]   Forces and displacements in colon surgery [J].
de Visser, H ;
Heijnsdijk, EAM ;
Herder, JL ;
Pistecky, PV .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (10) :1426-1430
[24]  
Dejima T, 2011, MED TREATMENT ENDOSC
[25]   Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report [J].
Desai, Mihir M. ;
Rao, Pradeep P. ;
Aron, Monish ;
Pascal-Haber, Georges ;
Desai, Mahesh R. ;
Mishra, Shashikant ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. ;
Gill, Inderbir S. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (01) :83-88
[26]   LESSons in minimally invasive urology [J].
Dev, Harveer ;
Sooriakumaran, Prasanna ;
Tewari, Ashutosh ;
Rane, Abhay .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (10) :1555-1559
[27]   Minimally invasive single-site surgery for the digestive system: A technological review [J].
Dhumane, Parag W. ;
Diana, Michele ;
Leroy, Joel ;
Marescaux, Jacques .
JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2011, 7 (01) :40-51
[28]   Design, Simulation and Evaluation of Kinematic Alternatives for Insertable Robotic Effectors Platforms in Single Port Access Surgery [J].
Ding, Jienan ;
Xu, Kai ;
Goldman, Roger ;
Allen, Peter ;
Fowler, Dennis ;
Simaan, Nabil .
2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2010, :1053-1058
[29]  
Diolaiti N, 2012, METHOD SYSTEM MOVING
[30]   Miniature in vivo robot for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery [J].
Dolghi, Oleg ;
Strabala, Kyle W. ;
Wortman, Tyler D. ;
Goede, Matthew R. ;
Farritor, Shane M. ;
Oleynikov, Dmitry .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (10) :3453-3458