Practical assessment of rotator cuff muscle volumes using shoulder MRI

被引:38
作者
Lehtinen, J [1 ]
Tingart, MJ
Apreleva, M
Zurakowski, D
Palmer, W
Warner, JJP
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Orthoped Biomech Lab, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA USA
来源
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA | 2003年 / 74卷 / 06期
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00016470310018270
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Reliable quantitative assessment of rotator cuff (RC) muscle volumes can be done by reconstructing multiple MRI images of the entire shoulder. However, an equally reliable, but less time-consuming, method is needed for clinical practice. We compared the only method reported for estimation of volume with a new simple MRI technique. Both methods were validated by multiple MRI image reconstruction. We performed MRI scans of 10 cadaver shoulders and determined the cross-sectional areas of RC muscles with two methods, using image analyzing software. In Method 1, the cross-sections were determined on a single image, previously described as a Y-shaped image. In Method 2, the cross-sections were calculated from two images: the Y-shaped and an image located medially, twice the distance from the glenoid articular surface compared to the Y-shaped image. We compared the results of these two methods with the volume of multiple MRI image reconstruction, which took into account all images consisting of RC cross-sections. Pearson correlations for Method 1 were 0.96, 0.94 and 0.75, and for Method 2, 0.96, 0.97 and 0.93 for the supraspinatus, infraspinatus/teres minor and subscapularis muscle volumes when compared with the volumes determined by the multiple image reconstruction method. The Bland-Altman method showed better agreement with multiple MRI image reconstruction, using Method 2, to determine supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis muscle volumes (p < 0.001 for each). The mean intra- and inter-observer variabilities of Method 1 was 3.9% and 2.9% and that of Method 2, 3.0% and 1.7%, respectively. Both methods can be used for quantitative assessment of RC muscle volumes. However, Method 2, using two easily reproducible MRI images is more accurate for the evaluation of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus/teres minor muscles and particularly for the subscapularis muscle.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 729
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF THE RABBITS SUPRASPINATUS MUSCLE AFTER RESECTION OF ITS TENDON [J].
BJORKENHEIM, JM .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1989, 60 (04) :461-463
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff [J].
Gerber, C ;
Fuchs, B ;
Hodler, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (04) :505-515
[4]  
GOUTALLIER D, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P78
[5]   MR imaging of the shoulder after rotator cuff repair [J].
Gusmer, PB ;
Potter, HG ;
Donovan, WD ;
OBrien, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (02) :559-563
[6]   ROTATOR CUFF DISEASE - ASSESSMENT WITH MR ARTHROGRAPHY VERSUS STANDARD MR IMAGING IN 36 PATIENTS WITH ARTHROSCOPIC CONFIRMATION [J].
HODLER, J ;
KURSUNOGLUBRAHME, S ;
SNYDER, SJ ;
CERVILLA, V ;
KARZEL, RP ;
SCHWEITZER, ME ;
FLANNIGAN, BD ;
RESNICK, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (02) :431-436
[7]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THE SHOULDER - SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY, AND PREDICTIVE VALUE [J].
IANNOTTI, JP ;
ZLATKIN, MB ;
ESTERHAI, JL ;
KRESSEL, HY ;
DALINKA, MK ;
SPINDLER, KP .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1991, 73A (01) :17-29
[8]   Muscle sizes and moment arms of rotator cuff muscles determined by magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Juul-Kristensen, B ;
Bojsen-Moller, F ;
Finsen, L ;
Eriksson, J ;
Johansson, G ;
Ståhlberg, F ;
Ekdahl, C .
CELLS TISSUES ORGANS, 2000, 167 (2-3) :214-222
[9]   MR imaging of the shoulder after surgery [J].
Magee, TH ;
Gaenslen, ES ;
Seitz, R ;
Hinson, GA ;
Wetzel, LH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (04) :925-928
[10]  
Matsen FA, 1998, SHOULDER, P755