Needs Assessment for Mohs Micrographic Surgery

被引:48
作者
Asgari, Maryam M. [1 ,2 ]
Olson, Jonathan M. [3 ]
Alam, Murad [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente No Calif, Div Res, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Dermatol, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Div Dermatol, Dept Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[6] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Mohs micrographic surgery; Needs assessment; Skin cancers; BASAL-CELL CARCINOMA; MICROCYSTIC ADNEXAL CARCINOMA; MALIGNANT FIBROUS HISTIOCYTOMA; EXTRAMAMMARY PAGETS-DISEASE; ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA; NONMELANOMA SKIN-CANCER; SURGICAL EXCISION; DERMATOLOGICAL SURGERY; SEBACEOUS CARCINOMA; DERMATOFIBROSARCOMA PROTUBERANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.det.2011.08.010
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a unique technique that can offer the highest cure rates and maximum tissue conservation in the management of specific primary and recurrent skin cancers. However, there are many areas of controversy that surround MMS, including appropriate indications for its use, technical quandaries, and outcomes. Recent efforts in these areas need to be assessed to identify research gaps in MMS to help fuel further work. The usefulness of MMS and its methods for delivery need more stringent, evidence-based, rigorous study.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Mohs micrographic surgery for melanoma: A case series, a comparative study of immunostains, an informative case report, and a unique mapping technique [J].
Albertini, JG ;
Elston, DM ;
Libow, LF ;
Smith, SB ;
Farley, MF .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2002, 28 (08) :656-665
[2]   Controversies in perioperative management of blood thinners in dermatologic surgery: Continue or discontinue? [J].
Alcalay, J ;
Alkalay, R .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2004, 30 (08) :1091-1094
[3]   Patient Satisfaction After Treatment of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer [J].
Asgari, Maryam M. ;
Bertenthal, Daniel ;
Sen, Saunak ;
Sahay, Anju ;
Chren, Mary-Margaret .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2009, 35 (07) :1041-1049
[4]  
ASGARI MM, ARCH DERMAT IN PRESS
[5]  
Bentkover Stuart H, 2002, Arch Facial Plast Surg, V4, P114, DOI 10.1001/archfaci.4.2.114
[6]   Extraocular sebaceous carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery: Report of a case and review of literature [J].
Berlin, Alexander L. ;
Amin, Snehal P. ;
Goldberg, David J. .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2008, 34 (02) :254-257
[7]   Mohs micrographic surgery vs traditional surgical excision - A cost comparison analysis [J].
Bialy, TL ;
Whalen, J ;
Veledar, E ;
Lafreniere, D ;
Spiro, J ;
Chartier, T ;
Chen, SC .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 140 (06) :736-742
[8]   Perioperative international normalized ratio level is a poor predictor of postoperative bleeding complications in dermatological surgery patients taking warfarin [J].
Blasdale, C. ;
Lawrence, C. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2008, 158 (03) :522-526
[9]   Cost Analysis of Mohs Micrographic Surgery in High-Risk Facial Basal Cell Carcinoma [J].
Blazquez-Sanchez, N. ;
de Troya-Martin, M. ;
Frieyro-Elicegui, M. ;
Funez-Liebana, R. ;
Martin-Marquez, L. ;
Rivas-Ruiz, F. .
ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2010, 101 (07) :622-628
[10]   Local control of primary Merkel cell carcinoma: Review of 45 cases treated with Mohs micrographic surgery with and without adjuvant radiation [J].
Boyer, JD ;
Zitelli, JA ;
Brodland, DG ;
D'Angelo, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2002, 47 (06) :885-892