The Fundamental Agency Problem and Its Mitigation: Independence, Equity, and the Market for Corporate Control

被引:520
作者
Dalton, Dan R. [1 ]
Hitt, Michael A. [2 ]
Certo, S. Trevis [2 ]
Dalton, Catherine M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Mays Coll Business, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/078559806
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A central tenet of agency theory is that there is potential for mischief when the interests of owners and managers diverge. In those circumstances, and for a variety of reasons, managers may be able to exact higher rents than are reasonable or than the owners of the firm would otherwise accord them. While that foundational element of agency theory is secure, other elements derived directly from agency theory are far less settled. Indeed, even after some 75 years of conceptualization and empirical research, the three principal approaches that have long been proposed to mitigate the fundamental agency problem remain contentious. Accordingly, we provide a review of the fundamental agency problem and its mitigation through independence, equity, and the market for corporate control.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 64
页数:64
相关论文
共 354 条
[1]   CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures [J].
Aboody, D ;
Kasznik, R .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2000, 29 (01) :73-100
[2]   Principals and agents, colonialists and company men: The decay of colonial control in the Dutch East Indies [J].
Adams, J .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1996, 61 (01) :12-28
[3]  
ALCHIAN AA, 1972, AM ECON REV, V62, P777
[4]  
ALCHIAN AA, 1973, J ECON HIST, V33, P16, DOI 10.1017/S0022050700076403
[5]  
Allouche J., 2005, Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, V57, P18
[6]   Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Reeb, DM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (03) :1301-1328
[7]  
[Anonymous], ACAD MANAGEMENT EXEC
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EC INNOCENT FRAUD
[9]  
Arrow KJ, 1974, The limits of organization
[10]  
Bainbridge SM, 2006, HARVARD LAW REV, V119, P1735