Low-Contrast and Low-Radiation Dose Protocol in Cardiac Computed Tomography: Usefulness of Low Tube Voltage and Knowledge-Based Iterative Model Reconstruction Algorithm

被引:19
作者
Iyama, Yuji [1 ,2 ]
Nakaura, Takeshi [2 ]
Yokoyama, Koichi [1 ,2 ]
Kidoh, Masafumi [2 ]
Harada, Kazunori [3 ]
Oda, Seitaro [2 ]
Tokuyasu, Shinichi [4 ]
Yamashita, Yasuyuki [2 ]
机构
[1] Amakusa Med Ctr, Diagnost Radiol, Amakusa, Japan
[2] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Kumamoto, Japan
[3] Amakusa Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Kumamoto, Japan
[4] Philips Healthcare Asia Pacific, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
imaging; computed tomography; coronary angiography; coronary artery disease; diagnosis; FILTERED BACK-PROJECTION; HYPERVASCULAR LIVER-TUMORS; IMAGE QUALITY; ABDOMINAL CT; REDUCTION; HYBRID; ANGIOGRAPHY; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1097/RCT.0000000000000440
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a low contrast, low-radiation dose protocol of 80-peak kilovoltage (kVp) with prospective electrocardiography-gated cardiac computed tomography (CT) using knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR). Methods: Thirty patients underwent an 80-kVp prospective electrocardiography-gated cardiac CT with low-contrast agent (222-mg iodine per kilogram of body weight) dose. We also enrolled 30 consecutive patients who were scanned with a 120-kVp cardiac CT with filtered back projection using the standard contrast agent dose (370-mg iodine per kilogram of body weight) as a historical control group. We evaluated the radiation dose for the 2 groups. The 80-kVp images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (protocol A), hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR, protocol B), and IMR (protocol C). We compared CT numbers, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio among 120-kVp protocol, protocol A, protocol B, and protocol C. In addition, we compared the noise reduction rate between HIR and IMR. Two independent readers compared image contrast, image noise, image sharpness, unfamiliar image texture, and overall image quality among the 4 protocols. Results: The estimated effective dose (ED) of the 80-kVp protocol was 74% lower than that of the 120-kVp protocol (1.4 vs 5.4 mSv). The contrast-to-noise ratio of protocol C was significantly higher than that of protocol A. The noise reduction rate of IMR was significantly higher than that of HIR (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in almost all qualitative image quality between 120-kVp protocol and protocol C except for image contrast. Conclusions: A 80-kVp protocol with IMR yields higher image quality with 74% decreased radiation dose and 40% decreased contrast agent dose as compared with a 120-kVp protocol, while decreasing more image noise compared with the 80-kVp protocol with HIR.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 947
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: Test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique
    Cademartiri, F
    Nieman, K
    van der Lugt, A
    Raaijmakers, RH
    Mollet, N
    Pattynama, PMT
    de Feyter, PJ
    Krestin, GP
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) : 817 - 823
  • [2] Distance-driven projection and backprojection in three dimensions
    De Man, B
    Basu, S
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (11) : 2463 - 2475
  • [3] Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and a Model-based Iterative Reconstruction in Abdominal CT: An Experimental Clinical Study
    Deak, Zsuzsanna
    Grimm, Jochen M.
    Treitl, Marcus
    Geyer, Lucas L.
    Linsenmaier, Ulrich
    Koerner, Markus
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Wirth, Stefan
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (01) : 197 - 206
  • [4] Dose reduction for coronary calcium scoring with hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction: an ex vivo study
    den Harder, Annemarie M.
    Willemink, Martin J.
    Bleys, Ronald L. A. W.
    de Jong, Pim A.
    Budde, Ricardo P. J.
    Schilham, Arnold M. R.
    Leiner, Tim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2014, 30 (06) : 1125 - 1133
  • [5] Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: Phantom study
    Funama, Y
    Awai, K
    Nakayama, Y
    Kakei, K
    Nagasue, N
    Shimamura, M
    Sato, N
    Sultana, S
    Morishita, S
    Yamashita, Y
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (03) : 905 - 910
  • [6] Evaluation of Coronary Artery Image Quality with Knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction
    Halpern, Ethan J.
    Gingold, Eric L.
    White, Hugh
    Read, Katrina
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 21 (06) : 805 - 811
  • [7] Radiation Risks of Medical Imaging: Separating Fact from Fantasy
    Hendee, William R.
    O'Connor, Michael K.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2012, 264 (02) : 312 - 321
  • [8] ENERGY IMPARTED IN COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    HUDA, W
    ATHERTON, JV
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (08) : 1263 - 1269
  • [9] Contrast-induced nephrotoxicity: Clinical landscape
    Katzberg, RW
    Haller, C
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 69 : S3 - S7
  • [10] Ultra-low dose abdominal MDCT: Using a knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction technique for substantial dose reduction in a prospective clinical study
    Khawaja, Ranish Deedar Ali
    Singh, Sarabjeet
    Blake, Michael
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    Choy, Gary
    Karosmangulu, Ali
    Padole, Atul
    Do, Synho
    Brown, Kevin
    Thompson, Richard
    Morton, Thomas
    Raihani, Nilgoun
    Koehler, Thomas
    Kalra, Mannudeep K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (01) : 2 - 10