Yield gap analysis to identify attainable milk and meat productivities and the potential for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation in cattle systems of Colombia

被引:20
作者
Gonzalez-Quintero, Ricardo [1 ]
van Wijk, Mark T. [2 ]
Ruden, Alejandro [1 ]
Gomez, Manuel [3 ]
Pantevez, Heiber [3 ]
Castro-Llanos, Fabio [1 ]
Notenbaert, An [1 ]
Arango, Jacobo [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Km 17, Valle Del Cauca, Colombia
[2] Int Livestock Res Inst ILRI, Bogota, Colombia
[3] FEDEGAN, Colombian Cattle Ranching Federat, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
Climate change; Environmental impact; Global warming potential; Mitigation potential; Productivity gaps; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; BEEF-PRODUCTION; DAIRY FARMS; PRODUCTION STRATEGIES; GHG EMISSIONS; OIL PALM; INTENSIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103303
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: Colombia has a total of 27.2 million heads of cattle, ranking fourth among the Latin American countries. Identifying sustainable strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) will help the Colombian government meet their goal of a 51% reduction in national emissions by 2030. Estimation of yield gaps for identifying the potential to improve cattle farms productivity and efficiency in Colombia help on reducing the GHGE intensities from the cattle sector. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to calculate the gap between attainable and actual milk and meat yields for specialized dairy, dual-purpose, cow-calf, and fattening production systems in 3 agro-ecological zones (AEZ) in Colombia; to identify the main aspects that restrict the meat and milk yields in these production systems; and analyze how closing yield gaps affect the carbon footprint (CF) of meat and milk production. METHODS: The most suitable AEZs for cattle activities were identified by considering environmental, climatic, edaphic, and land characteristics. From a dataset of 1505 surveyed farms, a yield gap benchmarking analysis for estimating the potential to increase meat and milk yields in each of the identified AEZ was applied. The most productive farms were included in the "best farms" while the rest of the farms belonged to the "farms operating below potential". A "cradle to farm-gate" Life Cycle Assessment was used to calculate the CF. Three scenarios were proposed for closing the yield gaps by 50, 75, and 100%, between the two groups of farms. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Three AEZs likely to support cattle activities in Colombia were identified. Average milk production from the farms operating below potential was 45-50% of potential production, and meat was 34-51%, indicating that a potential to achieve increases in milk and meat productivity exists. CFs of 1 kg milk or meat were lower in the groups of best-performing farms than in the groups of farms operating below potential. Yield gaps for milk and meat production can be closed by improving cattle management practices and better technologies. As a general trend, closing the yield gaps decreases the CFs. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings contribute to understand the farms' current productive performance and provides key insights into the possible technological and managerial changes for improving the productivity of cattle systems in Colombia. In addition, the study showed how milk and meat CFs can be lowered with the adoption of proper cattle management practices, and better technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Socioeconomic and productive characterization of dual-purpose farms oriented to milk production in a subtropical region of Mexico [J].
Albarran-Portillo, Benito ;
Rebollar-Rebollar, Samuel ;
Garcia-Martinez, Anastacio ;
Rojo-Rubio, Rolando ;
Aviles-Nova, Francisca ;
Manuel Arriaga-Jordan, Carlos .
TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2015, 47 (03) :519-523
[2]   Addressing the yield gap in rainfed crops: a review [J].
Anderson, Walter ;
Johansen, Chris ;
Siddique, Kadambot H. M. .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 36 (01) :1-13
[3]  
[Anonymous], Compilation Guidelines for Provincial Greenhouse Gas Inventories EB/OL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Results | Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model (GLEAM) | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [WWW Document]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, STAT FOOD AGR LIV BA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, B INT DAIRY FEDERATI
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Climate change 2014: synthesis report, VIPCC
[8]   Ambition Meets Reality: Achieving GHG Emission Reduction Targets in the Livestock Sector of Latin America [J].
Arango, Jacobo ;
Ruden, Alejandro ;
Martinez-Baron, Deissy ;
Loboguerrero, Ana Maria ;
Berndt, Alexandre ;
Chacon, Mauricio ;
Torres, Carlos Felipe ;
Oyhantcabal, Walter ;
Gomez, Carlos A. ;
Ricci, Patricia ;
Ku-Vera, Juan ;
Burkart, Stefan ;
Moorby, Jon M. ;
Chirinda, Ngonidzashe .
FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2020, 4
[9]  
Ariza-Nieto C, 2020, Alimentro: El valor nutricional de recursos forrajeros de Colombia. Sistema de informacion
[10]   Biomass consumption and environmental footprints of beef cattle production in Argentina [J].
Arrieta, Ezequiel M. ;
Cabrol, Diego A. ;
Cuchietti, Anibal ;
Gonzalez, Alejandro D. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2020, 185