Prenatal diagnosis and prevalence of Down syndrome in the Parisian population, 2001-2005

被引:7
作者
de Vigan, C. [1 ,2 ]
Khoshnood, B. [1 ,2 ]
Cadio, E. [1 ,2 ]
Vodovar, V. [1 ,2 ]
Goffinet, F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] INSERM, UMR S149, IFR 69, Unite Rech Epidemiol & Sante Perinatale Sante Fem, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 06, UPMC, UMR S 149, F-75005 Paris, France
来源
GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE | 2008年 / 36卷 / 02期
关键词
Down syndrome; prevalence; prenatal diagnosis; screening policy; Paris; France; Paris registry of congenital anomalies;
D O I
10.1016/j.gyobfe.2007.12.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives. - To assess recent trends in the prevalence of Down syndrome and the proportion of cases with a prenatal diagnosis in the Parisian population. Patients and methods. - Four hundred and ninety-nine cases of Down syndrome were registered by the Paris Registry of Congenital Anomalies during the period 2001-2005. All cases with prenatal diagnosis were confirmed by cytogenetic examination. We analyzed trends in the total and live birth prevalence, the proportion of cases with a prenatal diagnosis and those with a pregnancy termination, as well as gestational age at diagnosis and termination. Analyses were stratified by maternal age and trends were tested by the Cochran-Armitage test and Anova. Results. - Total prevalence of Down syndrome remained high (37.6 per 10,000 births, 95%CI 34.2-40.9) during this period because of advanced maternal age in Paris. The proportion of cases with a prenatal diagnosis (overall average 85.5%, 95% CI 81.8-88.1), and live birth prevalence of Down syndrome (7.1 per 10,000 live births, 95%CI 5.7-8.6) have remained fairly stable over time. The great majority of women (95% CI 95% 92.7-96.9) opted for a pregnancy termination following a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. A trend towards an earlier gestational age at prenatal diagnosis was noted among women less than 30 years of age. Discussion and conclusion. - It is important to continue to evaluate changes in the prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, notably in view of potential changes in screening practices and policies, and particularly if a first trimester strategy is adopted following recent recommendation by the "Haute Autorite de sante". (c) 2007 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 150
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] De Vigan C, 2005, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), V34, P8
  • [2] Dolk H, 2005, REV EPIDEMIOL SANTE, V53, p2S87
  • [3] *EUROCAT, 2002, 8 EUROCAT
  • [4] Goujard J, 2004, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, V32, P496, DOI 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2004.04.008
  • [5] *HAS, RAPP EV STRAT DEP TR
  • [6] Effects of maternal age and education on the pattern of prenatal testing:: Implications for the use of antenatal screening as a solution to the growing number of amniocenteses
    Khoshnood, B
    Blondel, B
    De Vigan, C
    Bréart, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (05) : 1336 - 1342
  • [7] KHOSHNOOD B, 2004, BJOG, V1111, P485
  • [8] Advances in medical technology and creation of disparities:: The case of Down syndrome
    Khoshnood, Babak
    De Vigan, Catherine
    Vocovar, Veronique
    Breart, Gerard
    Goffinet, Francois
    Blondel, Beatrice
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 96 (12) : 2139 - 2144
  • [9] First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome
    Malone, FD
    Canick, JA
    Ball, RH
    Nyberg, DA
    Comstock, CH
    Bukowski, R
    Berkowitz, RL
    Gross, SJ
    Dugoff, L
    Craigo, SD
    Timor-Tritsch, IE
    Carr, SR
    Wolfe, HM
    Dukes, K
    Bianchi, DW
    Rudnicka, AR
    Hackshaw, AK
    Lambert-Messerlian, G
    Wald, NJ
    D'Alton, ME
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (19) : 2001 - 2011
  • [10] Mansfield C, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P808, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199909)19:9<808::AID-PD637>3.0.CO