Any non-welfarist method of policy assessment violates the Pareto principle

被引：112

作者：

Kaplow, L ^{[1
]}

Shavell, S

机构：

[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Law, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA

[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY | 2001年 / 109卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1086/319553

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

The public at large, many policymakers, and a number of economists hold views of social welfare that are non-welfarist. That is, they attach some importance to factors other than the effects of policies on individuals' utilities. We show, however, that any non-welfarist method of policy assessment violates the Pareto principle.

引用

页码：281 / 286

页数：6

共 12 条

[1] CARDINAL WELFARE, INDIVIDUALISTIC ETHICS, AND INTERPERSONAL COMPARISON OF UTILITY - COMMENT
DIAMOND, PA
[J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1967, 75 (05) : 765 - 766
[2] Hare RM., 1981, Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point, DOI 10.1093/0198246609.001.0001
[3] KAPLOW L, 1863, UTILITARIANISM
[4] Kaplow L., 1999, American Law and Economics Review, V1, P63
[5] MIRRLEES JA, 1982, UTILIARIANISM
[6] Musgrave R., 1989, THEORY PUBLIC FINANC
[7] MUSGRAVE RA, 1990, NATL TAX J, V43, P113
[8] IMPOSSIBILITY OF A PARETIAN LIBERAL
SEN, A
[J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1970, 78 (01) : 152 - 157
[9] SENAMARTYA K, 1992, ECONOMICA, V59, P139
[10] SENAMARTYA K, 1985, COMMODITIES CAPABILI

← 1 2 →