Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: Perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration

被引:89
作者
Iverson, Paul [1 ]
Evans, Bronwen G. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Phonet & Linguist, London NW1 2HE, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.2783198
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
This study examined whether individuals with a wide range of first-language vowel systems (Spanish, French, German, and Norwegian) differ fundamentally in the cues that they use when they learn the English vowel system (e.g., formant movement and duration). All subjects: (1) identified natural English vowels in quiet; (2) identified English vowels in noise that had been signal processed to flatten formant movement or equate duration; (3) perceptually mapped best exemplars for first-and second-language synthetic vowels in a five-dimensional vowel space that included formant movement and duration; and (4) rated how natural English vowels assimilated into their L I vowel categories. The results demonstrated that individuals with larger and more complex first-language vowel systems (German and Norwegian) were more accurate at recognizing English vowels than were individuals with smaller first-language systems (Spanish and French). However, there were no fundamental differences in what these individuals learned. That is, all groups used formant movement and duration to recognize English vowels, and learned new aspects of the English vowel system rather than simply assimilating vowels into existing first-language categories. The results suggest that there is a surprising degree of uniformity in the ways that individuals with different language backgrounds perceive second language vowels. (c) 2007 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:2842 / 2854
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Synthesis fidelity and time-varying spectral change in vowels [J].
Assmann, PF ;
Katz, WF .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 117 (02) :886-895
[2]  
Best C.T., 1995, Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, P171
[3]   Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system [J].
Best, CT ;
McRoberts, GW ;
Goodell, E .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 109 (02) :775-794
[4]  
BOERMAN P, 2005, PRAAT DOING PHONETIC
[5]  
Bohn Ocke-Schwen., 1992, STUD SECOND LANG ACQ, V14, P131, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0272263100010792
[6]   INTERLINGUAL IDENTIFICATION AND THE ROLE OF FOREIGN-LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE IN L2 VOWEL PERCEPTION [J].
BOHN, OS ;
FLEGE, JE .
APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 1990, 11 (03) :303-328
[7]  
BOHN OS, 1995, SPEECH PERCEPTION LI
[8]   Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization [J].
Cebrian, Juli .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2006, 34 (03) :372-387
[9]  
Delattre P., 1965, Comparing the Phonetic Features of English, French, German, and Spanish
[10]   Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory [J].
Escudero, P ;
Boersma, P .
STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2004, 26 (04) :551-585