Measuring and Analyzing Students' Strategic Learning Behaviors in Open-Ended Learning Environments

被引:9
作者
Zhang, Ningyu [1 ]
Biswas, Gautam [1 ]
Hutchins, Nicole [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept EECS, Inst Software Integrated Syst, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Learning strategies; Simulations; Open-ended learning environments; Learning by modeling; COMPUTATIONAL THINKING; MOTIVATIONAL STRATEGIES; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; SELF-REGULATION; HELP-SEEKING; DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; PERSPECTIVE; UNDERSTAND; ANALYTICS;
D O I
10.1007/s40593-021-00275-x
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Strategies are an important component of self-regulated learning frameworks. However, the characterization of strategies in these frameworks is often incomplete: (1) they lack an operational definition of strategies; (2) there is limited understanding of how students develop and apply strategies; and (3) there is a dearth of systematic and generalizable approaches to measure and evaluate strategies when students' work in open-ended learning environments (OELEs). This paper develops systematic methods for detecting, interpreting, and analyzing students' use of strategies in OELEs, and demonstrates how students' strategies evolve across tasks. We apply this framework in the context of tasks that students perform as they learn science topics by building conceptual and computational models in an OELE. Data from a classroom study, where sixth-grade students (N = 52) worked on science model-building activities in our Computational Thinking using Simulation and Modeling (CTSiM) environment demonstrates how we interpret students' strategy use, and how strategy use relates to their learning performance. We also demonstrate how students' strategies evolve as they work on multiple model-building tasks. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of our strategy framework in analyzing students' behaviors and performance in CTSiM.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 970
页数:40
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]  
AGRAWAL R, 1995, PROC INT CONF DATA, P3, DOI 10.1109/ICDE.1995.380415
[2]   PICTORIAL-VERBAL AND ANALYTIC-HOLISTIC LEARNING-STRATEGIES IN SCIENCE LEARNING [J].
ALESANDRINI, KL .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 73 (03) :358-368
[3]   A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects [J].
Alexander, PA ;
Graham, S ;
Harris, KR .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1998, 10 (02) :129-154
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The international encyclopedia of education
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Journal of Learning Analytics, DOI DOI 10.18608/JLA.2015.21.3
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The handbook of research synthesis
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Metacognition Learning, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11409-007-9016-7
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School: Expanded Edition
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education., DOI DOI 10.3233/JAI-2011-018
[10]   Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (25) :3083-3107