The public's perspectives on advance directives: Implications for state legislative and regulatory policy

被引:70
作者
Pollack, Keshia M. [1 ]
Morhaim, Dan
Williams, Michael A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Dispar Solut, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Sinai Hosp, Dept Neurol, Sandra & Malcolm Berman Brain & Spine Inst, Baltimore, MD 21215 USA
关键词
Advance directives; Legislative policy; End-of-life care; OF-LIFE CARE; DECISION-MAKING; COMPLETION RATES; COMMUNICATION; ATTITUDES; PREFERENCES; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.01.004
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Determine the prevalence of advance directives (ADs) in Maryland and identify the barriers and enablers to their adoption, in order to guide the formulation of state legislative policy. Methods: Cross-sectional survey administered over the telephone to a representative age-stratified random sample of 1195 Maryland adults. Results: Approximately 34% (n = 401) of Maryland adults reported having an AD. Older adults (65+ years) were more likely than younger adults (18-64 years) to have ADs (p<0.001): the proportional difference between those with and without ADs diminished as age increased. Two times as many Whites than Blacks reported having ADs (43-23%; p<0.001). Of those who had an AD, the primary motivations for creating one was a personal medical condition or a diagnosis to one's self or a family/friend (41%). Those without ADs identified lack of familiarity with them (27%), being too young or healthy to need one (14%), or uncertainty of the process for adopting one (11%) as reasons for not having one. Conclusions: Barriers to AD adoption appear amenable to policy interventions. Policies that seek to increase access and ensure ease of enrollment, combined with a targeted public health advocacy campaign, may help increase the prevalence of ADs. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 63
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, STAND DEF FIN DISP C
[2]   Surrogate decision making: Reconciling ethical theory and clinical practice [J].
Berger, Jeffrey T. ;
DeRenzo, Evan G. ;
Schwartz, Jack .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 149 (01) :48-+
[3]  
Braun K L, 2000, Hawaii Med J, V59, P440
[4]   Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision making [J].
Braun, Ursula K. ;
Beyth, Rebecca J. ;
Ford, Marvella E. ;
McCullough, Laurence B. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 (03) :267-274
[5]   Assessing the effectiveness of interventions to promote advance directives among older adults: A systematic review and multi-level analysis [J].
Bravo, Gina ;
Dubois, Marie-France ;
Wagneur, Bernard .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 67 (07) :1122-1132
[6]  
Brown Barbara A, 2003, J Gerontol Nurs, V29, P4
[7]  
Burg M A, 1995, J Fla Med Assoc, V82, P811
[8]  
*CENS US, MAR QUICKFACTS 2006
[9]  
Colello K. J., 2009, 75700 C RES SERV
[10]   Why don't patients and physicians talk about end-of-life care?: Barriers to communication for patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and their primary care clinicians [J].
Curtis, JR ;
Patrick, DL ;
Caldwell, ES ;
Collier, AC .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (11) :1690-1696