Verbal behavior and risky choice in humans: Exploring the boundaries of the description-experience gap

被引:3
作者
Cox, David J. [1 ]
Dallery, Jesse [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Psychol, 945 Ctr Dr, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
Risky choice; Uncertain choice; Description versus experience; Verbal behavior; Probability discounting; Description-experience gap; DECISIONS; OUTCOMES; PROBABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.beproc.2018.09.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The description-experience (DE) gap is a tendency to prefer uncertain over certain rewards when experienced compared to described. DE gap research typically intermixes choice between two gains with choice between two losses. Because preference for uncertain gains have been found to increase following experienced loss, preference for uncertain gains (and the DE gap) may decrease when gains are presented in isolation. Experiment 1 examined the DE gap when participants were presented choices between gains (points) in isolation. Experiment 2 examined the DE gap when participants were presented with gains in isolation and intermixed with point losses. When gains were first contacted in isolation, participants chose the uncertain gain more when it was described compared to experienced (a reversed DE gap). But, when gains were intermixed with losses, participants chose the uncertain gain more when it was experienced compared to described (typical DE gap). Additional exposure to intermixed following isolated choices led to a typical DE gap, and exposure to isolated following intermixed choices decreased the size of the typical DE gap. These results show how choice with experienced or described outcomes is influenced by intermixing gains with losses and may reveal how the DE gap can be manipulated.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 308
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 24.0
[2]  
[Anonymous], NIH PUBLICATION, V16-CA-8029A
[3]   When and why rare events are underweighted: A direct comparison of the sampling, partial feedback, full feedback and description choice paradigms [J].
Camilleri, Adrian R. ;
Newell, Ben R. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2011, 18 (02) :377-384
[4]   Description- and experience-based choice: Does equivalent information equal equivalent choice? [J].
Camilleri, Adrian R. ;
Newell, Ben R. .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2011, 136 (03) :276-284
[5]   Impulsivity influences betting under stress in laboratory gambling [J].
Canale, Natale ;
Rubaltelli, Enrico ;
Vieno, Alessio ;
Pittarello, Andrea ;
Billieux, Joel .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[6]   A Choice Prediction Competition: Choices from Experience and from Description [J].
Erev, Ido ;
Ert, Eyal ;
Roth, Alvin E. ;
Haruvy, Ernan ;
Herzog, Stefan M. ;
Hau, Robin ;
Hertwig, Ralph ;
Stewart, Terrence ;
West, Robert ;
Lebiere, Christian .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2010, 23 (01) :15-47
[7]   Framing From Experience: Cognitive Processes and Predictions of Risky Choice [J].
Gonzalez, Cleotilde ;
Mehlhorn, Katja .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2016, 40 (05) :1163-1191
[8]   Decisions From Experience and Statistical Probabilities: Why They Trigger Different Choices Than a Priori Probabilities [J].
Hau, Robin ;
Pleskac, Timothy J. ;
Hertwig, Ralph .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2010, 23 (01) :48-68
[9]   The Description-Experience Gap in Risky Choice: The Role of Sample Size and Experienced Probabilities [J].
Hau, Robin ;
Pleskac, Timothy J. ;
Kiefer, Juergen ;
Hertwig, Ralph .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2008, 21 (05) :493-518
[10]   Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice [J].
Hertwig, R ;
Barron, G ;
Weber, EU ;
Erev, I .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (08) :534-539