Voting: A machine learning approach

被引:19
作者
Burka, David [1 ]
Puppe, Clemens [2 ,3 ]
Szepesvary, Laszlo [4 ]
Tasnadi, Attila [5 ]
机构
[1] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Dept Comp Sci, Fovam Ter 8, H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Dept Econ & Management, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
[3] Higher Sch Econ, Moscow, Russia
[4] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Dept Operat Res & Actuarial Sci, Fhovamter 8, H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
[5] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Dept Math, Foovam Ter 8, H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
Group decisions and negotiations; Voting; Social choice; Neural networks; Machine learning; Borda count; NEURAL-NETWORKS; RULE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2021.10.005
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Voting rules can be assessed from quite different perspectives: the axiomatic, the pragmatic, in terms of computational or conceptual simplicity, susceptibility to manipulation, and many others aspects. In this paper, we take the machine learning perspective and ask how prominent voting rules compare in terms of their learnability by a neural network. To address this question, we train the neural network to choosing Condorcet, Borda, and plurality winners, respectively. Remarkably, our statistical results show that, when trained on a limited (but still reasonably large) sample, the neural network mimics most closely the Borda rule, no matter on which rule it was previously trained. The main overall conclusion is that the necessary training sample size for a neural network varies significantly with the voting rule, and we rank a number of popular voting rules in terms of the sample size required. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1003 / 1017
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, A comprehensive foundation, DOI [10.1142/S0129065794000372, DOI 10.1142/S0129065794000372]
[2]  
Balinski M., 2016, MAJORITY JUDGEMENT V
[3]   VOTING SCHEMES FOR WHICH IT CAN BE DIFFICULT TO TELL WHO WON THE ELECTION [J].
BARTHOLDI, J ;
TOVEY, CA ;
TRICK, MA .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 1989, 6 (02) :157-165
[4]   Does avoiding bad voting rules result in good ones? [J].
Bednay, Dezso ;
Moskalenko, Anna ;
Tasnadi, Attila .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 45 (05) :448-451
[5]  
Brandt F., 2016, Handbook of Computational Social Choice
[6]  
Burka D., 2016, Technical report, V96, DOI [10.5445/IR/1000062014, DOI 10.5445/IR/1000062014]
[7]  
Dorsey R. E., 1994, NEW DIRECTION COMPUT, P19
[8]  
Drton M., 2004, MEDIEVISTE ORDINATEU, V43
[9]   Distance rationalization of voting rules [J].
Elkind, Edith ;
Faliszewski, Piotr ;
Slinko, Arkadii .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2015, 45 (02) :345-377
[10]   Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions [J].
Fischer, Thomas ;
Krauss, Christopher .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 270 (02) :654-669